The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Test First. Counsel Later.

NTD Laboratories, Inc. of New York describes itself as "a specialty hi-tech, bio-medical laboratory dedicated to pre-natal screening for birth defects," is announcing an "extraordinary, new, non-invasive, Ultra-Screen(R) Instant Risk Assessment (IRA(SM)) at-home blood test, which paves the way for the earliest possible on the spot, risk assessment of the most common chromosomal abnormalities with 91% accuracy." The test is marketed as an at-home early warning test for Trisomy 18 and Down Syndrome.
This new program includes an at-home blood test, which can be done by the patient in the privacy of her home. The patient uses an in-home blood specimen collection system and sends her dried blood card directly to NTD Laboratories as early as nine weeks of pregnancy. By the time the patient sees her doctor for her eleven-week ultrasound, the blood results have been entered into the NTD Labs database, and the patient can receive instant information and risk analysis. With 91% accuracy, this makes Ultra-Screen IRA the earliest, most stress-free test available. Other versions of the test require the patient to give a blood sample at the time of the 11-week ultrasound examination, meaning the patient must wait days after the ultrasound to know her baby's Down syndrome and trisomy 18 status. Ultra-Screen Instant Risk Assessment Program means early reassurance for millions of pregnant woman.
After the screening, the company suggests that it will now be possible to arrange "same day genetic counseling," an improvement that is produced (ironically) by the fact that the patient has already been tested. [Thanks Gregor Wolbring]

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Could Spider Silk Save Your Life?

Posted today at Nanotech-Now.com, Summer Johnson has written a column on the ethical issues with the new polymer nanocomposites that material scientists have created and... (more)

Wolpe on "60 Minutes": Reading Minds for Cookies and Car Accidents

If you missed it this Sunday, as our own Dr. Paul Wolpe himself did for being in an airplane, you can catch it again here--the... (more)

Thrill Seeking Brains and the People Who Have Them

Researchers from Vanderbilt University have found that some brains process dopamine differently resulting in greater "thrill seeking" behavior, says BBC News. Essentially, these individuals have... (more)

The Nose Knows (Or Why Smoking Should Be Banned Everywhere)

According to a recent Harvard study, published in this month's journal of Pediatrics, there isn't just first-hand and second-hand smoke, now there is another kind... (more)

Son, Just Tack Your Ritalin onto Your Tuition Bill

John Harris has publicly proclaimed that university students should be allowed to take cognitively enhancing drugs, such as Ritalin, to boost academic performance, says the... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags