Test First. Counsel Later.

NTD Laboratories, Inc. of New York describes itself as "a specialty hi-tech, bio-medical laboratory dedicated to pre-natal screening for birth defects," is announcing an "extraordinary, new, non-invasive, Ultra-Screen(R) Instant Risk Assessment (IRA(SM)) at-home blood test, which paves the way for the earliest possible on the spot, risk assessment of the most common chromosomal abnormalities with 91% accuracy." The test is marketed as an at-home early warning test for Trisomy 18 and Down Syndrome.
This new program includes an at-home blood test, which can be done by the patient in the privacy of her home. The patient uses an in-home blood specimen collection system and sends her dried blood card directly to NTD Laboratories as early as nine weeks of pregnancy. By the time the patient sees her doctor for her eleven-week ultrasound, the blood results have been entered into the NTD Labs database, and the patient can receive instant information and risk analysis. With 91% accuracy, this makes Ultra-Screen IRA the earliest, most stress-free test available. Other versions of the test require the patient to give a blood sample at the time of the 11-week ultrasound examination, meaning the patient must wait days after the ultrasound to know her baby's Down syndrome and trisomy 18 status. Ultra-Screen Instant Risk Assessment Program means early reassurance for millions of pregnant woman.
After the screening, the company suggests that it will now be possible to arrange "same day genetic counseling," an improvement that is produced (ironically) by the fact that the patient has already been tested. [Thanks Gregor Wolbring]

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags