Home Testing to Determine Fetus' Sex

Alta Charo notes:
The Boston Globe on Monday profiled a test launched earlier this month that allows pregnant women in the United States to determine the sex of their fetus as early as five weeks gestation. The $25 Baby Gender Mentor test, marketed by Mommy's Thinkin' and available exclusively at pregnancystore.com, includes a finger prick kit for pregnant women to collect a blood specimen. Women then can send the blood sample to a laboratory based in Lowell, Mass., which analyzes fetal DNA in the pregnant woman's blood for an additional charge of $250. Lab technicians test the blood for the presence of a Y chromosome, which would indicate the fetus is male, or the absence of the chromosome in the case of a female fetus. The pregnant woman receives the test results in two to three days. Although the test is aimed at "the type of woman who can't wait to open Christmas presents," some ethicists and physicians are concerned the new test could lead to sex-selective abortion, especially among cultures that favor male children, according to the Globe. Most pregnant women have the opportunity to learn the sex of their fetus during a routine ultrasound around 16 weeks gestation, though the results are not 100% accurate (Goldberg, Boston Globe, 6/27).
[thanks Andrea Kalfoglou]

comments

The republicans are really going to have a field day with this issue. It's only a matter of time, if they remain in power, that abortion will be made illegal. I myself and hoping for the pendulum to begin swinging the other way and the dems will regain power.

Extagen, why would only the Republicans work to make it illegal to kill human beings simply because of their gender? Abortion for gender selection is illegal in much of the world.
Your lack of objectivity is tripping you up if you only see such killing as a politically partisan issue.
The gap in male to female ratio is warped in India and China, for instance. Wonder what the future holds for these nations?

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags