Ian Wilmut Pushes the Case for Cloning Humans

Without so much as uttering the phrase, Wilmut quietly articulates the case not only for the potential efficacy of "therapeutic cloning" but also for ceasing to use that word and "re-claiming" the scientific use of the verb "clone," i.e. meaning the activities that have been more recently associated with therapeutic cloning as a moniker.

comments

Well, Wilmut has also supported reproductive cloning once it is safe, suggesting, along with Glenn McGee, that requests of potential cloners be treated like adoption requests are now handled. He has walked a long way in the wrong direction since he eschewed any interest in human cloning in his book about the creation of the third cloned mammal, Dolly.

I've always found the reasons against reproductive cloning, once the safety issues are put to one side, to be pretty vague.
Can anyone give me some strong reasons that don't fall back on an unanalysed reference to dignity? (Note: I think arguments in favor of reproductive cloning in terms of autonomy are pretty flimsy too.)

"Bring me human eggs, the necessary social consensus and legal permission and I can get you your replica within a year," says cloning expert Park Se-pill of Korea's Maria Biotech. "In contrast to widespread public belief, cloning a human is much easier than cloning a cow or pig."
From today's Red Nova News
"Someone, Somewhere Is Trying to Clone a Human Now."
http://www.rednova.com/news/science/217425/someone_somewhere_is_trying_to_clone_a_human_now/

Actually, issues of human dignity are important. And they are not unanalyzed. But they are certainly not the whole story. If you haven't read "Human Cloning and Human Dignity," from the President's Council, it provides a superb analysis of why reproductive cloning would be wrong. And, it was unanimous, meaning that not only Leon Kass, Robert George, and Bill Hurlbut signed on, but so did supporters of therapeutic cloning such as William May and the martyred Elizabeth Blackburn.

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Looking for Dr. Right? Get Yours via Speed Date!

Want to find your "Dr. Right"? Now, you can! You can meet your next doctor on a "speed date." Dne Texas hospital is trying its... (more)

End of Life-ology

William King is dying from MS. His two twenty-something sons, Ennis and Malcolm, already lost their mother to cancer 15 years earlier and now must... (more)

If You Are STILL Wondering Why Health Care Reform Is Important...

Check out this statistic from the Chicago Tribune today: "Illinois consumers to pay up to 60% more [for health insurance premiums], data show." When do... (more)

Glenn McGee and American Catholics in Assisted Reproduction Barfight

First published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and then the Washington Post, Glenn McGee makes the provocative claim that American Catholics aren't any more... (more)

The blog.bioethics.net Archive Rises Like a ...

At last we've found a few minutes to assemble the archive of The American Journal of Bioethics Editors' blog through 2007 and publish them in... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags