Theater of the Dead Bodies

Chicago Tribune reviews a very strange-sounding new bit of theater, performed in a surgical classroom at the Neuropsychiatric Institute of the University of Illinois at Chicago:
This is a grim part of town on a weekend evening. Unless a few cadavers are looking to escape a future in research, Local Infinities Visual Theater is not going to attract walk-up business.

This site-specific show sounds like a ghoulish Halloween prank. In actuality, it's one of the most intellectually absorbing theater pieces of the year. For anyone with an interest in medical ethics, or the history of science, or the way art and science fused uneasily together during the Renaissance, this Gelatin-fueled affair is not to be missed.Granted, you might take some persuading.In essence, this multimedia show wants you to ponder what it means and what it has historically meant to dissect a human corpse. There is, of course, the obvious issue of medical necessity. But that does not occur in a vacuum. The act of dissection comes with many fascinating questions. Is the dissectionist a scientist? Or an artist? Or an exhibitionist? Or all three at once?

This show is set during the Renaissance, when dissections frequently were done in public. But before you argue that's no longer the case and those issues thus moot, ponder the recent phenomenal success of the "Body Worlds" exhibit at the Museum of Science and Industry. There's still big, big money to be made from the exhibition of dead human bodies. And it's always fraught with ethical questions.

There's the issue of who gets dissected — it has often been criminals, or the otherwise dispossessed. In the case of the young Renaissance body of Suster Luyt, the first woman to get publicly pulled to bits in Amsterdam, there's no question that voyeurism and sexual fascination also played a part. Some people signed up to see the Luyt dissection because there was no other public forum to stare at a naked woman's body.

Has anybody seen this? It sounds amazing, worth a ticket to Chicago even.

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags