The Ultimate Sex Drug
Alta Charo turned us on to the best news ever in enhancement technology. The media will search high and low and find not a credible soul who will oppose it. It is the sex inhaler, the smell Pepe le Pew always thought that he emitted. It is the love drug. For real. New York Magazine's Julian Dibbell reports:Now entering Phase 3 clinical trials: the first real, honest-to-God, horny-making, body-shaking, equal-opportunity aphrodisiac. Horn of rhinoceros. Penis of tiger. Root of sea holly. Husk of the emerald-green blister beetle known as the Spanish fly. So colorful and exotic is the list of substances that have been claimed to heighten sexual appetite that it’s hard not to feel a twinge of disappointment on first beholding the latest entry—a small white plastic nasal inhaler containing an odorless, colorless synthetic chemical called PT-141. Plain as it is, however, there is one thing that distinguishes PT-141 from the 4,000 years’ worth of recorded medicinal aphrodisiacs that precede it: It actually works.Happy Thanksgiving, indeed.
And it’s coming to a medicine cabinet near you. The drug will soon enter Phase 3 clinical trials, the final round of testing before it goes to the Food and Drug Administration for review, and with the FDA’s approval it could reach the market in as soon as three years. The full range of possible risks and side effects has yet to be determined, but already this much is known: Putting that inhaler up your nose and popping off a dose of PT-141 results, in most cases, in a stirring in the loins in as few as fifteen minutes. Women, according to one set of results, feel “genital warmth, tingling and throbbing,” not to mention “a strong desire to have sex.” Among men, who’ve been tested with the drug more extensively, the data set is, shall we say, richer... [details omitted, read them at the site if you must, I blushed]
The precise mechanisms by which PT-141 does its job remain unclear, but the rough idea is this: Where Viagra acts on the circulatory system, helping blood flow into the penis, PT-141 goes straight to the brain itself. And there it goes to work, switching on the same neural circuitry that lights up when a person actually, you know, wants to.
“It’s not merely allowing a sexual response to take place more easily,” explains Michael A. Perelman, co-director of the Human Sexuality Program at New York Presbyterian Hospital and a sexual-medicine adviser on the PT-141 trials. Though he cautions against jumping to conclusions, he’s hopeful that the drug represents a breakthrough. “It may be having an effect, literally, on how we think and feel.”
I see a lot of couples in my practice—lawyer couples, banker couples—who don’t know how to relax,” says Leonore Tiefer, a professor of psychiatry at New York University School of Medicine. “That’s fine—it’s a big asset to them in their corporate lifestyle, where they can work 80 hours a week—but then I have to shut off two BlackBerrys in my office in order to keep the noise down. They’re trained to multitask. Well, it doesn’t seem that that is really doable when it comes to sex. And they’re angry about that: It should be doable. And they need it to be doable because they only have five minutes.”
The five-minute meaningful sexual encounter: If ever there was a holy grail for the age of the tight-wired global economy—with its time-strapped labor force and its glut of bright, shiny distractions—that is it...
contribute a comment
Comments have been closed for this post.











comments
Buy stock now!
And while you're at it, invest in internet porn, too.
- by Ereshkigal on Nov 23, 2005 at 4:22 PM | link
BlyssPlus, anyone?
- by Sparky on Nov 23, 2005 at 6:54 PM | link
The next thing, I suppose, is the development of the orgasmatron. Get rid of the whole romance nonsense altogether: inhale some PT-141, get off with the orgasmatron, and have the rest of the evening to yourself.
- by jimmy d on Nov 23, 2005 at 9:50 PM | link
I don't doubt it will be spammed to my e-mail repeatedly like all of the other sexual enhancement products. Is it me or my age?
- by Wesley J. Smith on Nov 23, 2005 at 11:13 PM | link
Which is the better answer? I forget who wrote that the Cialis commercials were literally the last straw in the emasculation of middle aged men, because they resort to an awfully ominous threat: "will you be ready?" Yikes.
- by Ed. on Nov 23, 2005 at 11:53 PM | link
Ed, the Cialis drug reps told me the ad was aimed at doctors who needed to be "ready" to prescribe. "I'm ready for you, are you ready for me?"
I told the reps that the ad sounded a little aggressive to me (an old wife and a long-time Rape Crisis Center volunteer). If the ad is not just this side of advocating date rape, it's still in the wrong hands: women (from what I've heard) are the only ones who actually know in advance whether the couple will be "makin' whoopee."
Pheromones will be interesting, to say the least. Should the Emergency Department and all the Sexual Assault Response Teams gear up for its debut?
Will true ED patients who use the PT-141 (one for one?) still need Viagra, etc.? Or
- by Beverly on Nov 24, 2005 at 5:45 AM | link