Chernobyl Legacy

The Chernobyl legacy is the subject of a webmontage that is very powerful and raises some unique bioethical issues. There is little written about the devastating legacy of malformed and mentally challenged child victims of the disaster, and this photojournalist has created a searing, narrated set of images that I encourage my colleagues to view.
- Paul Root Wolpe

comments

What evidence is there that these congenital problems increased after the disaster, or linking such an increase to the fallout? This is indeed a searing portrait of inhumane treatment of fellow human beings (children being fed on the floor, etc), and we should be rightfully disturbed by it. But I can't tell from the video whether it has actually been established that the rate of birth defects rose by a statistically valid amount after the fallout. The WHO Chernobyl report I just pulled up at http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/who_chernobyl_report_2006.pdf seems to indicate (to my relatively untrained eye) that the increase is not substantial, and not enough to account for the majority of the children seen in the video.
What is the increase, has it been firmly established?
mary

Very disturbing and thought provoking.

Too bad the site is not visible for those who use Firefox :-(

Excellent comment from Mary. I'm also interested in the real impact of Chernobyl. There will be birth defects and childhood cancers in any population, due purely to the genetic potluck that is conception.
Everyone assumes that any of these conditions in Ukraine must be caused by fallout/radiation, but I haven't really seen a good paper that establishes a link. I'm afraid it might be a case of "seems so, must be so" public perception...

Chernobyl, one of the most polluted places. Here http://pripyat.com/en/photo_gallery/ - more than 6000 photos from
this territory. More than 20 years passed, but knowbody knows exactly what is going on there. Also there are
articles, ivestigations, news

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags