The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Who Owns What is in the Dish? Wash U, that's Who

St. Louis Dispatch reports that:
A federal judge in St. Louis has ruled in favor of Washington University that donors of tissue samples for medical research surrender control over who uses them...

The decision "runs roughshod on patients' rights," said Dr. William J. Catalona, the prostate cancer researcher who collected the disputed samples. Catalona was a faculty member at the university for 27 years. He established a tissue bank, known as the GU Biorepository, that now includes samples from more than 30,000 men.

When he left to become director of the prostate cancer program at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Catalona sent letters to 10,000 patients who had donated blood, tumor samples and DNA for his research. The letters asked patients to write to Washington University and ask that their samples be transferred to Catalona.

More than 6,000 men told Washington University that they wanted Catalona, not the university, to possess their samples.

When Catalona tried to block the National Cancer Institute from using samples from the repository, Washington University filed suit for control of the material and accused the doctor of making misleading statements to patients in his effort to take it back.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Stephen Limbaugh ruled in favor of the university, declaring it the sole owner of the disputed tissue samples and granting it permission to use the samples for appropriate research, and the authority to transfer the tissues to other institutions.

"I do think it is a big setback for patients' rights," said Lori Andrews, an ethicist at the Illinois Institute of Technology and a law professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law.

comments

There was a great long article about tissue ownership in the New York Times Magazine this weekend (www.nasw.org/users/skloot/TakingTheLeast.pdf), then a bunch of follow up about the Catalona case on the writers' blog (http://rebeccaskloot.blogspot.com). Interesting stuff.

Here is a link that has the atual decision.
http://prostatecure.wustl.edu/pdf/opinion.pdf

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Will the Real Patient Please Stand Up?

What do your local McDonald's, Macy's and hospital have in common? While you are in line to get your Big Mac, Crocs or to get... (more)

A 1918 Flu Memoir

My grandfather was an amazing man, biologically speaking. He lived until age 103, so healthy that family lore has it that his cancer-ridden prostate... (more)

Top 5 Stories of the Week on Bioethics.net

Just in case you missed them, below are the most-read news stories of the week from bioethics.net. Summer Johnson, PhD New possibilities for stem cell... (more)

Harvesting Hearts As Fast as One Can: Is It Ethical?

The controversy surrounding the New England Journal of Medicine article about using cardiac death as the criterion for death in pediatric heart transplant has... (more)

Money! Turns Out Its Bad for You...

Peter Singer opines in today's Accra Daily Mail, one of Ghana's capital city newspapers, about the evils of money. Singer cites a behavioral study that... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags

Locations of visitors to this page