Newborn Screening with a Twist:
Unproven but Expensive Test, Unproven but Expensive Treatment that Might Kill Those with Late Onset Form of Gene

New York is all set to become the first government in the world to start screening for Krabbe disease, as a result of lobbying by former Buffalo Bills quarterback Jim Kelly. The testing, which is expensive, can turn up, if there aren't too many false negatives, the 1 in 150,000 infants born with the early onset form of this autosomal recessive trait that results in terrible symptoms followed by death typically before age 2.

There is no proven treatment, but a group at Duke has an interesting experiment underway that involves destroying the bone marrow of the affected infants with chemo, then replacing it with hematopoietic stem cells intended as a bone marrow transplant. It has worked, they report, 20 times, as best they can tell, but it is incredibly risky - and many of those who have the disease inherit the late onset form - which might be very difficult to differentiate.

New York passed no law nor created a program to pay to enroll children in the experimental protocol at Duke, which isn't free, though this article claims that such payment from insurance companies might be no problem. Either way, the expenditure of this level of resource on something this rare, and where the risk of mis-identifying an infant who really has late-onset Krabbe, is difficult to justify when 30% of our nation has insufficient health insurance for far more common conditions.

comments

Excellent point! Instead, let us pretend that Krabbe, along with all of the other leukodystrophies, do not exist, burying our "heads in the sand". The argument that we should not continue to expand newborn screening never ceases to amaze me. What is the medical community about if not saving the lives of EVERY PATIENT they can, especially newborn children. If we take the approach suggested in your article, we will never find a cure for these or any other terminal diseases.
So, here, here, New York! Thank you for piloting this program, being a leader in the expansion of newborn screening. Now, we shall actually see how many children are truly affected by this horrific disease.
Without risk, there would be no progress -
Amy Nash

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags