The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Six Degrees of Scientific Misconduct

Stanley Milgram one of the 'giants' of social science seems to have misrepresented the findings in one of his classic studies. Maybe we are not as interconnected as we think we are! And what sayeth those social scientists who continue to insist that there is no need to hold their feet to the same regulatory fire as pertains to medical research? - Art Caplan

comments

Both Albert-Laszlo Barabasi (in "Linked: The New Science of Networks") and Duncan Watts ("Six Degrees") talk about Milgram's ideas, and the flaws in the study - including the fact that most of the letters in these studies (which Watts, at least, has also done) never make it to their target. At least in the current science of networking stuff, it's very clear that the six degrees (it's actually five and high decimals - shall we cry inaccuracy for saying six instead?) is merely the average steps for those that get there.
Both Barabasi, and Malcolm Gladwell in his pop-sci "The Tipping Point", talk about how it's not that we're all six degrees, it's that we all know people who function, in networking terms, as hubs - the connecting points. Because we know them, we 'know' lots of people - or at least have the potential for connection. But Barabasi shows that it's actually quite few people who are these hubs, and it's governed by power laws.
All of which is to say, the BBC article and the researcher in it are both several years behind the times, at least in terms of connectivity, networking, and our understanding of how those social systems function. It's kind of much ado about nothing.

And in odd timing, right after I wrote that, I saw an advertisement for the new JJ Abrahms show, "Six Degrees". Wanna bet it misrepresents the theory just as well as the play/Will Smith's movie did?

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Art Caplan One of the Smartest People on the Planet?
Discovering Minds Want to Know...

Check out this update from the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics noting that Arthur Caplan has been recognized by Discover Magazine. The article... (more)

Brain Ethics Comes to the Nation's Capital

This Thursday and Friday, November 13th and 14th, the Neuroethics Society will meet in Washington DC at the AAAS Headquarters. According to Martha Farah, Communications... (more)

"Odd" Baby Play = Autism?

A recent study published by the UC Davis MIND Institute has found that infants who repetitively play with toys by spinning them or rattling them... (more)

Crestor for All?

It turns out that not just the high cholesterol crowd benefits from the use of anti-cholesterol medications, in this case Crestor, says Bloomberg. Recent studies... (more)

Caplan on Change Coming for Stem Cells

Arthur Caplan is conjecturing that the battle over stem cells may be coming to an end with the coming Obama administration, on MSNBC.com. Full-text of... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags