Hard to watch. Powerful.

I guess if you can spend this much money on a campaign with stem cells at the center, you can get an ad like this together. But this ad may well foreshadow the next presidential election. Joshua Marshall noted in his Talking Points Memo that the thing is still too close to call (well that wasn't his metaphor, but I didn't like his metaphor. But the ad is precisely what will turn the tides against the Rove move to turn social issues into a "get out the church vote" in key swing states. Maybe.

At a minimum it returns the tone of the debate to the Star Versus Star model, where you'll recall (well, I do anyway, because I had to debate him) that Mel Gibson was the best that the "other side" could do - and he's begun to demonstrate that his hard line position may be a symptom of near-psychosis perhaps a less effective "star representative." There are always the Snow Children, I guess.

What is so troubling about these commercials, as with the Reeve commercials, is that they plainly foment therapeutic misconception: people in Missouri should not have to believe that Mr. Fox would be cured if only the President had funded stem cell research, or that Missouri could somehow do much much more than its current, formidable stem cell research were there a little bolus of cash in that state for the science. It's not as bad as right wing ads that flat out lie about adult stem cell "therapies," or signing ceremonies with a few of the miniscule number of embryos ever to be adopted - none of whom were destined for stem cell research anyway. The ad is above

comments

Power advert.
Painful commentary left by other people watching the commercial on YouTube, though - although I suspect it's an accurate cross-section of beliefs about stem cells.

"Adult stem cell 'therapies'"????? What is with the quotes?

It's not as bad as right wing ads that flat out lie about adult stem cell "therapies,"
I really don't understand this judgement. What exactly is worse about these right wing ads, and what lies do they tell? Could the author elaborate this point, please?

A completely deceptive ad. Talent has not urged the outlawing of stem cell research. He opposes Amendment 2, which would create a MO constitutional right to human SCNT. That isn't the same thing at all.

Wesley, the ad says Talent "opposes expanding stem cell research," and that he "wanted to criminalize the science that gives us a chance for hope." The latter reference, I think, is to Talent's co-sponsorship of Sen. Brownback's anti-cloning bill, which would indeed criminalize cloning--and not just "reproductive cloning."

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Looking for Dr. Right? Get Yours via Speed Date!

Want to find your "Dr. Right"? Now, you can! You can meet your next doctor on a "speed date." Dne Texas hospital is trying its... (more)

End of Life-ology

William King is dying from MS. His two twenty-something sons, Ennis and Malcolm, already lost their mother to cancer 15 years earlier and now must... (more)

If You Are STILL Wondering Why Health Care Reform Is Important...

Check out this statistic from the Chicago Tribune today: "Illinois consumers to pay up to 60% more [for health insurance premiums], data show." When do... (more)

Glenn McGee and American Catholics in Assisted Reproduction Barfight

First published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and then the Washington Post, Glenn McGee makes the provocative claim that American Catholics aren't any more... (more)

The blog.bioethics.net Archive Rises Like a ...

At last we've found a few minutes to assemble the archive of The American Journal of Bioethics Editors' blog through 2007 and publish them in... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags