Asimov would be pleased

South Korea has announced that they are drawing up a code of robot ethics, to prevent humans from abusing robots, and robots from abusing humans. Asimov would be so pleased!

While it's unclear if the code of ethics will follow Asimov's laws of robotics (an idea their convened panelists of scientists and sci-fi authors have not ruled out), Park Hye-Young of the Ministry of Information and Communication has indicated that a major concern is that people will be interacting with their robots like spouses, or become addicted to them (as many people appear to be addicted to cyberspace in general). And according to the BBC, "key considerations would include ensuring human control over robots, protecting data acquired by robots and preventing illegal use."

-Kelly Hills

comments

The line about the spouses caught my eye. So the robots get a code of ethics, but the wives? Not so much...

I am very pleased with the technological advancements of this particular aspect.
In the movie Irobot, it was evident that not many percautions were being done thinking that since we created the robot, it has no control other than our own. On the contrary, we are creating a species, so to speak. We are giving it the ability to walk,talk, and carry out motions.
I agree that certain limits and l ines should be drawn heavily on the robotics ethic issue to keep a safe and efficient source of technology into the world.

I understand where Eden is coming from, and do believe that certain limits and lines should be drawn but, to what extent. We are limiting the freedoms of the robots, say, would you like it if you were not allowed to speak out of turn or defend yourself from accusations. I believe though that when it comes down to technology and robotics that giving a mind to another creation as if you were god would be a drastic measure. We would not even know how the thing would act/behave in divers situation. That’s why I think that it would be good to keep rules on robots yet not ones that are tied down and un changeable. If they were then we wouldn’t be able to correct them once we found out how the robots reacted in situations.

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

The November Issue of AJOB Is Now Online!

With H1N1 and flu vaccines on everyone's minds, the November issue of The American Journal of Bioethics couldn't be more timely. What do people think... (more)

Q & A on What is a Blockbuster Anti-Wrinkle Cream Worth, Morally Speaking
Or How Many Fetuses Does It Take To Make a Great Cosmeceutical

Question: What is it worth to produce a blockbuster anti-wrinkle cream? Hypothetical Answer from Cosmeceutical Company: A single skin biopsy of a 14-week old voluntarily... (more)

Bioethics Needs More Than Number Crunchers, says Caplan

Even as one trained in said number or data or fact crunching--whether you want to call us social scientists or empirical bioethicists or what have... (more)

Should Hwang Do Time in the Big House?

For the disgrace and shame he placed upon stem cell research in South Korea and for many stem cell research more generally, he should do... (more)

Is Nanotechnology the Key to Happiness?

Nanotechnology has been called a great many things--the great leveler, the panacea to all that ails the world, the technology that will allow us to... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags