Asimov would be pleased

South Korea has announced that they are drawing up a code of robot ethics, to prevent humans from abusing robots, and robots from abusing humans. Asimov would be so pleased!

While it's unclear if the code of ethics will follow Asimov's laws of robotics (an idea their convened panelists of scientists and sci-fi authors have not ruled out), Park Hye-Young of the Ministry of Information and Communication has indicated that a major concern is that people will be interacting with their robots like spouses, or become addicted to them (as many people appear to be addicted to cyberspace in general). And according to the BBC, "key considerations would include ensuring human control over robots, protecting data acquired by robots and preventing illegal use."

-Kelly Hills

comments

The line about the spouses caught my eye. So the robots get a code of ethics, but the wives? Not so much...

I am very pleased with the technological advancements of this particular aspect.
In the movie Irobot, it was evident that not many percautions were being done thinking that since we created the robot, it has no control other than our own. On the contrary, we are creating a species, so to speak. We are giving it the ability to walk,talk, and carry out motions.
I agree that certain limits and l ines should be drawn heavily on the robotics ethic issue to keep a safe and efficient source of technology into the world.

I understand where Eden is coming from, and do believe that certain limits and lines should be drawn but, to what extent. We are limiting the freedoms of the robots, say, would you like it if you were not allowed to speak out of turn or defend yourself from accusations. I believe though that when it comes down to technology and robotics that giving a mind to another creation as if you were god would be a drastic measure. We would not even know how the thing would act/behave in divers situation. That’s why I think that it would be good to keep rules on robots yet not ones that are tied down and un changeable. If they were then we wouldn’t be able to correct them once we found out how the robots reacted in situations.

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

March Issue of AJOB is Now Online!

Trans fat bans, peer recruitment for human subjects research, and the clash of culture versus the rights of physicians are the featured issues in this... (more)

Trans Fats Today. Hot Dogs Tomorrow?

Will banning artificial trans fats today effect your ability to have a hot dog tomorrow? On the The Bioethics Channel, Lorell LaBoube seeks an answer... (more)

Looking for Dr. Right? Get Yours via Speed Date!

Want to find your "Dr. Right"? Now, you can! You can meet your next doctor on a "speed date." Dne Texas hospital is trying its... (more)

End of Life-ology

William King is dying from MS. His two twenty-something sons, Ennis and Malcolm, already lost their mother to cancer 15 years earlier and now must... (more)

If You Are STILL Wondering Why Health Care Reform Is Important...

Check out this statistic from the Chicago Tribune today: "Illinois consumers to pay up to 60% more [for health insurance premiums], data show." When do... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags