The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Asimov would be pleased

South Korea has announced that they are drawing up a code of robot ethics, to prevent humans from abusing robots, and robots from abusing humans. Asimov would be so pleased!

While it's unclear if the code of ethics will follow Asimov's laws of robotics (an idea their convened panelists of scientists and sci-fi authors have not ruled out), Park Hye-Young of the Ministry of Information and Communication has indicated that a major concern is that people will be interacting with their robots like spouses, or become addicted to them (as many people appear to be addicted to cyberspace in general). And according to the BBC, "key considerations would include ensuring human control over robots, protecting data acquired by robots and preventing illegal use."

-Kelly Hills

comments

The line about the spouses caught my eye. So the robots get a code of ethics, but the wives? Not so much...

I am very pleased with the technological advancements of this particular aspect.
In the movie Irobot, it was evident that not many percautions were being done thinking that since we created the robot, it has no control other than our own. On the contrary, we are creating a species, so to speak. We are giving it the ability to walk,talk, and carry out motions.
I agree that certain limits and l ines should be drawn heavily on the robotics ethic issue to keep a safe and efficient source of technology into the world.

I understand where Eden is coming from, and do believe that certain limits and lines should be drawn but, to what extent. We are limiting the freedoms of the robots, say, would you like it if you were not allowed to speak out of turn or defend yourself from accusations. I believe though that when it comes down to technology and robotics that giving a mind to another creation as if you were god would be a drastic measure. We would not even know how the thing would act/behave in divers situation. That’s why I think that it would be good to keep rules on robots yet not ones that are tied down and un changeable. If they were then we wouldn’t be able to correct them once we found out how the robots reacted in situations.

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Earbuds Killed the Radio Star

How many times have you told someone or been told that the tunes blaring in your MP3 player of choice are just too darn loud... (more)

Lonely "Virgin Mary" Shark Proves Her Species Doesn't Need Males Either

Scientists have reported in the Journal of Fish Biology (a real page turner) that for the second time, a lonely lady shark in captivity has... (more)

Bioethicist, Nancy Kass, Joins the IOM Ranks

EurekaAlert says that Johns Hopkins School of Public Health bioethicist Nancy Kass has been elected to the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine. She... (more)

Web Searching Better For Brain Than Books

Neuroscience researchers have found that Googling is more stimulating to the brain than reading a book, crosswording, or any other kind of activity for baby-boomers,... (more)

Web Searching Better For Brain Than Books

Neuroscience researchers have found that Googling is more stimulating to the brain than reading a book, crosswording, or any other kind of activity for baby-boomers,... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags