The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Selective Reduction of a Multiple Pregnancy

Imagine experiencing infertility, and then finding out that you are pregnant -- with triplets! Doctors then recommend that you reduce the pregnancy to twins because of the risk of trying to carry triplets for both mom and the babies. You weigh the potential of losing all three babies to a miscarriage or giving birth to three premature infants vs. intentionally ending the life of one. How do you choose which one?

There are no statistics to know how many women face this "Sophie's Choice" each year; however, the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), particularly fertility drugs, has increased the number of women faced with this decision. Liza Mundy explores this issue with great sensitivity in the Washington Post Magazine this week and follows up with an on-line chat on the topic. Mark Evans is to be commended for his willingness to discuss this sensitive topic with Mundy.

What Mundy doesn't discuss is why these multiple pregnancies exist in the first place. Yes, she mentions that they are the product of ART, but she doesn't talk about the controversy that exists in the ART community over practicing fertility medicine responsibly. Howard Jones and other outspoken infertility treatment providers have advocated for guidelines to limit the number of embryos transferred to a woman's uterus during IVF treatment. ASRM has recently adopted guidelines, but they still allow for more than two embryos to be transferred. Other countries have taken to fining ART clinics that produce too many multiple births. We also need to work on educating IVF and fertility drug patients that multiples are not a blessing. It's high time that every ART provider lose the cavalier attitude (that I've personally heard) that selective reduction as a simply way to deal with a multiple pregnancy. The risks of multiple pregnancy must be clearly explained to women as part of the consent process for both IVF and the use of fertility drugs. Responsible providers will follow the ASRM guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer and carefully monitor cycles using fertility drugs, canceling those cycles when too many ovarian follicles are developing.

A good follow-up study on the effects of selective reduction on women and families is also needed. It might help infertile couples who think they want a multiple pregnancy understand what responsible providers are trying to avoid.
-Andrea Kalfoglou

comments

Having just met the triplets of a close friend who were delivered at 34 wks after in vitro, the other side of risk is close tracing of the babies in utero. Parents were very informed and decided to mover forward and now have beautiful and healthy babies. (they just don't sleep much)

Truly a Sophie's choice. Having lost twins at 20 weeks due to early labor of undetermined cause, my next pregnancy (AI after clomid) yielded 4 embryos. After selective reduction, I carried a beautiful baby to term. despite the positive outcome, the choice, the procedure, and the permanent 'what ifs' make this anything but a cavalier choice, and it should not be treated as one.

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Earbuds Killed the Radio Star

How many times have you told someone or been told that the tunes blaring in your MP3 player of choice are just too darn loud... (more)

Lonely "Virgin Mary" Shark Proves Her Species Doesn't Need Males Either

Scientists have reported in the Journal of Fish Biology (a real page turner) that for the second time, a lonely lady shark in captivity has... (more)

Bioethicist, Nancy Kass, Joins the IOM Ranks

EurekaAlert says that Johns Hopkins School of Public Health bioethicist Nancy Kass has been elected to the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine. She... (more)

Web Searching Better For Brain Than Books

Neuroscience researchers have found that Googling is more stimulating to the brain than reading a book, crosswording, or any other kind of activity for baby-boomers,... (more)

Web Searching Better For Brain Than Books

Neuroscience researchers have found that Googling is more stimulating to the brain than reading a book, crosswording, or any other kind of activity for baby-boomers,... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags