The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

ACT creates embryonic stem cell line; keeps embryos alive

Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) announced in Nature Magazine in August of 2006 that they were creating embryonic stem cell lines from biopsied embyros. The headlines were a bit misleading, suggesting that this method did not result in the destruction of the embryos, when it did. Today, ACT announced at the fifth annual meeting of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) in Cairns, Australia that they had created three separate embryonic stem-cell lines without actually destroying the biopsied embryos. These three embryos are still alive in a freezer. ACT is now calling upon NIH to fund research using these three stem-cell lines because their creation is compatible with President Bush's statement he made following his veto of a bill from Congress that would have expanded federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. While I applaud ACT's creativity in trying to work within the current US regulatory limits on embryonic stem-cell research, I'm curious what ACT plans to do with these frozen embryos. Will they ever be gestated, or will they just remain "undestroyed" for the next few decades? Another question that bugs me: who actually "owns" these embryos? If they are gestated and born, will they have "registered trademarked" stamped on their foreheads?

-Andrea Kalfoglou

comments

While I share some of your concerns/thoughts none of them are really unique to this process. The same questions can be asked about embryos in frozen storage...will they ever be gestated or will they remain in storage or simply destroyed? Who owns them? What if the genetic parents of the embryo have severed whatever relationship they have...and so on. So, while I agree that these issues need to be addressed, I don't think that ACT has created novel issues with this technique.

Certainly its hard to make the argument that it would be better if they'd destroyed the embryo in the course of their work.

contribute a comment

Comments have been closed for this post.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

You Break It, You Buy It

It turns out that the feds have finally decided to stop shelling out dollars to pay for the surgeries that fix the botched one from... (more)

Bargain Basement Genome

Next Big Future says that Applied Biosystems has announced that the $10,000 complete human genome is now in reach, taking less than 2 weeks to... (more)

Clean a Tooth--Save a Baby

Who would have thought there would be a correlation between healthy teeth and healthy babies? Well, it turns out that researchers at Aetna and Columbia... (more)

Wait a Minute Mister Postman....

First, actual anthrax showed up in letters in a mailroom. Now, DHHS says that the treatment for anthrax is doing to be delivered out of... (more)

23andHerBreasts

On Thursday, 23andMe announced their latest initiative aimed at bringing together the largest cohort of women with breast cancer "to build an infrastructure, based on... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags