About zonking the kids with Benadryl...

It's frowned upon. The issue's been floating around the web after a mom and toddler were booted from a flight last month when the kid wouldn't stop chanting, "Bye bye, plane!" According to the mother (and ABC), her conversation with the flight attendant went like this:

"She leaned over the gentleman who was sitting next to me, and she said, 'OK, it's not funny anymore. You need to shut your baby up," Penland said.

Penland said she told the flight attendant that she expected her child to fall asleep momentarily.

"'It doesn't matter. Regardless, I don't want to hear it,'" Penland said the flight attendant told her.

"'It's called Baby Benadryl,'" Penland said the attendant told her, suggesting she give her child allergy medication to help him fall asleep fast.

"I said, 'Well, I'm not going to drug my child so you have a pleasant flight,'" Penland said.

And that's when the skies became not-so-friendly.

Well, an article in today's New York Times rolls out some of the reasons kids shouldn't be "sedated" with diphenhydramine. They include possible side effects such as breathing problems, constipation, increased hyperactivity and -- though it's not spelled out exactly -- a belief that zonking your kid is just kind of tacky. Yourself? Now that's a different question. From the article:

Dr. Kenneth R. Cohen, a psychiatrist in New York who specializes in psychopharmacology, suggested another way of looking at the problem: not the restless children, but the adults who have a hard time dealing with them.


For those adults, he said, there are anti-anxiety medications, which should be taken under a doctor's direction and should be tried out at home first.

Hmm. So, let's review:

Drugging the kids because they're being annoying? Bad.

Drugging yourself because the kids are being annoying? OK.

Noted.

-Greg Dahlmann

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags