The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Paying -- or not -- to keep fat off in the future

While we're all talking about how -- and how much -- to pay for medical care, here's one more item to chew on. If obesity can be caused by a virus, then it might also be prevented with a vaccine. And if a company ever develops one, imagine that marketing campaign. And the fight over how much the vaccine should cost, and who should pay for it.

Of course, the cost-savings in the long-term could be enormous.

-Greg Dahlmann

comments

How much are we willing to bet that an "obesity vaccine" will be approved in record time, made affordable, and added to every child's shot regimen... even as the HPV vaccine continues to be stymied by moralists?

Of course, having the backing of and funding from the fast food industry won't hurt.

It is highly unlikely that is virus plays more than a small role in most cases of obesity anyway. And a psychoactive chemical that cut obesity would not be covered due to judgements that people "should" use willpower where a behavioral mechanism is implicated, even when they clearly can't (very few people are willfully choosing to be obese).

If this did ever materialize, it would probably end up in the same place as the car that runs on water, or the car tires that last 500,000 miles. There is too much money on both sides of the obesity market to ever let this happen. If by some miracle it made it to the market, you better believe that big pharma would maximize their profits.

Besides which, the idea of an obesity vaccine moves very clearly backwards so far as research goes - research which shows obesity has a wide range of causes. Much like trying to put together a large jigsaw puzzle, there is no one clear cause or reason for obesity - we see pieces of the puzzle as its being put together: genetics, willpower, prenatal care, illness, injury, and so on and so forth.

The notion of a single cause for an illness/disease seems as outmoded as the notion that a single gene will be responsible for a single problem. While it can happen, the reality tends to be much more diverse.

We do a disservice to focus on single cause/cure models for illness, be it obesity or anything else. Likewise, when we don't use care in our language when we discuss issues of disease/illness - when we talk about cures for people who might not be looking for one - we contribute to the very stigmatizing social situations that exist, and in theory one would hope bioethicists would be attempting to reduce, rather than reinforce.

Kelly makes a lot of good points. I think it would be interesting to see how the general public would react if such a vaccine was ever developed and marketed. As Kelly pointed out, obesity is almost without a doubt a multi-factorial condition. Even if a viral infection does play some role -- and it could be prevented -- there are still all the other players. To what extent should the maker of this potential vaccine be responsible for educating people about the whole story? And how willing would the public be to process that complicated message? We tend to like things quick and simple.

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Will the Real Patient Please Stand Up?

What do your local McDonald's, Macy's and hospital have in common? While you are in line to get your Big Mac, Crocs or to get... (more)

A 1918 Flu Memoir

My grandfather was an amazing man, biologically speaking. He lived until age 103, so healthy that family lore has it that his cancer-ridden prostate... (more)

Top 5 Stories of the Week on Bioethics.net

Just in case you missed them, below are the most-read news stories of the week from bioethics.net. Summer Johnson, PhD New possibilities for stem cell... (more)

Harvesting Hearts As Fast as One Can: Is It Ethical?

The controversy surrounding the New England Journal of Medicine article about using cardiac death as the criterion for death in pediatric heart transplant has... (more)

Money! Turns Out Its Bad for You...

Peter Singer opines in today's Accra Daily Mail, one of Ghana's capital city newspapers, about the evils of money. Singer cites a behavioral study that... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags

Locations of visitors to this page