Frozen embryos get some colorful representation in court

Via Art Caplan and BioEdge comes this item by Wired's Kristen Philipkoski about a lawyer who has filed suit on behalf of a frozen embryo. Martin Palmer is suing California Institute of Regenerative Medicine chairman Robert Klein on the argument that the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research violates the 13th and 14th amendments of the US Constitution (that would be the prohibition against slavery and equal protection under the law, respectively).

There was a hearing to decide the appropriate venue for the case last week and it seems to have been quite the scene. From a KNBC-TV report:

In Tuesday's hearing, Palmer started his argument by paraphrasing the Bible.

"In the beginning there was a message and that message is life," he said, then later quoted the New Testament's Gospel according to John.

"Your argument is quite eloquent but it's not addressing why we're here today," said Judge Kim Wardlaw.

Undeterred, Palmer sought to liken Doe's situation to the plight of slaves before the Civil War. The choice of the name "Scott" is a deliberate reference to Dred Scott, the slave who in 1857 lost a lawsuit aimed to win his freedom, Palmer said.

"Have embryos been enslaved?" [Judge] Fernandez asked.

Palmer replied they had, and added that California was "abandoning its heritage" because it was admitted into the Union as a free state in 1850.

When Fernandez pressed Palmer on exactly what injury Doe suffered, he finally said: "We're seeking to invalidate Proposition 71 on its face."

Palmer then accused the defendants of ignoring the issue of the morality of stem-cell research by focusing on the legal issue of venue.

Apparently this exchange was later followed by Palmer scattering rose petals and the judge rolling her eyes.

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags