The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Frozen embryos get some colorful representation in court

Via Art Caplan and BioEdge comes this item by Wired's Kristen Philipkoski about a lawyer who has filed suit on behalf of a frozen embryo. Martin Palmer is suing California Institute of Regenerative Medicine chairman Robert Klein on the argument that the use of embryos for embryonic stem cell research violates the 13th and 14th amendments of the US Constitution (that would be the prohibition against slavery and equal protection under the law, respectively).

There was a hearing to decide the appropriate venue for the case last week and it seems to have been quite the scene. From a KNBC-TV report:

In Tuesday's hearing, Palmer started his argument by paraphrasing the Bible.

"In the beginning there was a message and that message is life," he said, then later quoted the New Testament's Gospel according to John.

"Your argument is quite eloquent but it's not addressing why we're here today," said Judge Kim Wardlaw.

Undeterred, Palmer sought to liken Doe's situation to the plight of slaves before the Civil War. The choice of the name "Scott" is a deliberate reference to Dred Scott, the slave who in 1857 lost a lawsuit aimed to win his freedom, Palmer said.

"Have embryos been enslaved?" [Judge] Fernandez asked.

Palmer replied they had, and added that California was "abandoning its heritage" because it was admitted into the Union as a free state in 1850.

When Fernandez pressed Palmer on exactly what injury Doe suffered, he finally said: "We're seeking to invalidate Proposition 71 on its face."

Palmer then accused the defendants of ignoring the issue of the morality of stem-cell research by focusing on the legal issue of venue.

Apparently this exchange was later followed by Palmer scattering rose petals and the judge rolling her eyes.

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Paying More for the Same Healthcare

The Associated Press just reported that in 2009 almost 60% of employers plan to pass on the effect of rising healthcare costs--greater premiums, increased co-pays,... (more)

AJOB Issue 8:7 is Hot Off the Presses!

Today on bioethics.net, the latest issue of the American Journal of Bioethics is posted. For those of you interested in reproductive ethics or ethical issues... (more)

Carl Zimmer says, "Watch Out! Here Comes Spore!"

In today's Times, Carl Zimmer writes about the upcoming release of the Sims-gone-evolutionary-biology-style. Ditch the 2.1 kids and the built community--it's time to create a... (more)

Will We Ever Learn in New Orleans?

According to reports on CNN News this morning, the most critical of patients in New Orleans area hospitals remain there with fingers crossed that the... (more)

Check it Out: AJOB Issue 8:6 Is Online

The June issue of the American Journal of Bioethics is online--but will only be on the front page of bioethics.net for another few days. So... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags