Cells that look and act like human embryonic stem cells created from skin cells

As mentioned over the weekend, the papers reporting that scientists in Japan and Wisconsin have re-programmed human skin cells to become virtually indistinguishable from embryonic stem cells were published today. The Yamanaka team reports in Cell (pdf) (updated link) that it was able to create "induced pluripotent stem" cells using the same method that had previously been shown to work in mice. When placed in culture, these cells differentiated into neurons and heart cells. A team led by James Thomson and Junying Lu at Wisconsin is reporting similar, independent results in Science. (updated link)

In a teleconference with the media today, Wisconsin's James Thomson predicted that these results marked the beginning of the end of the controversy surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells. "The world has changed because of this result," he said, adding that human embryonic stem cells are still important for research and "it's not the time to abandon embryonic stem cell research." In a press release, Shinya Yamanaka emphasized that more testing is necessary to verify that iPS cells are in fact the equivalent of embryonic stem cells. It would be "premature to conclude that iPS cells can replace embryonic stem cells," Yamanaka is quoted as saying.

This development is still a long way from leading to therapies. Thomson predicted that iPS cells probably solve problems related to immune rejection, but there's still a lot to be understood about how disease works and how these cells might be introduced to provide treatment. "We have a lot of work to do," he said.

-Greg Dahlmann

Earlier on blog.bioethics.net:
+ Are we in the middle of a shift in stem cell research?

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags