Cells that look and act like human embryonic stem cells created from skin cells

As mentioned over the weekend, the papers reporting that scientists in Japan and Wisconsin have re-programmed human skin cells to become virtually indistinguishable from embryonic stem cells were published today. The Yamanaka team reports in Cell (pdf) (updated link) that it was able to create "induced pluripotent stem" cells using the same method that had previously been shown to work in mice. When placed in culture, these cells differentiated into neurons and heart cells. A team led by James Thomson and Junying Lu at Wisconsin is reporting similar, independent results in Science. (updated link)

In a teleconference with the media today, Wisconsin's James Thomson predicted that these results marked the beginning of the end of the controversy surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells. "The world has changed because of this result," he said, adding that human embryonic stem cells are still important for research and "it's not the time to abandon embryonic stem cell research." In a press release, Shinya Yamanaka emphasized that more testing is necessary to verify that iPS cells are in fact the equivalent of embryonic stem cells. It would be "premature to conclude that iPS cells can replace embryonic stem cells," Yamanaka is quoted as saying.

This development is still a long way from leading to therapies. Thomson predicted that iPS cells probably solve problems related to immune rejection, but there's still a lot to be understood about how disease works and how these cells might be introduced to provide treatment. "We have a lot of work to do," he said.

-Greg Dahlmann

Earlier on blog.bioethics.net:
+ Are we in the middle of a shift in stem cell research?

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

The November Issue of AJOB Is Now Online!

With H1N1 and flu vaccines on everyone's minds, the November issue of The American Journal of Bioethics couldn't be more timely. What do people think... (more)

Q & A on What is a Blockbuster Anti-Wrinkle Cream Worth, Morally Speaking
Or How Many Fetuses Does It Take To Make a Great Cosmeceutical

Question: What is it worth to produce a blockbuster anti-wrinkle cream? Hypothetical Answer from Cosmeceutical Company: A single skin biopsy of a 14-week old voluntarily... (more)

Bioethics Needs More Than Number Crunchers, says Caplan

Even as one trained in said number or data or fact crunching--whether you want to call us social scientists or empirical bioethicists or what have... (more)

Should Hwang Do Time in the Big House?

For the disgrace and shame he placed upon stem cell research in South Korea and for many stem cell research more generally, he should do... (more)

Is Nanotechnology the Key to Happiness?

Nanotechnology has been called a great many things--the great leveler, the panacea to all that ails the world, the technology that will allow us to... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags