The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Cells that look and act like human embryonic stem cells created from skin cells

As mentioned over the weekend, the papers reporting that scientists in Japan and Wisconsin have re-programmed human skin cells to become virtually indistinguishable from embryonic stem cells were published today. The Yamanaka team reports in Cell (pdf) (updated link) that it was able to create "induced pluripotent stem" cells using the same method that had previously been shown to work in mice. When placed in culture, these cells differentiated into neurons and heart cells. A team led by James Thomson and Junying Lu at Wisconsin is reporting similar, independent results in Science. (updated link)

In a teleconference with the media today, Wisconsin's James Thomson predicted that these results marked the beginning of the end of the controversy surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells. "The world has changed because of this result," he said, adding that human embryonic stem cells are still important for research and "it's not the time to abandon embryonic stem cell research." In a press release, Shinya Yamanaka emphasized that more testing is necessary to verify that iPS cells are in fact the equivalent of embryonic stem cells. It would be "premature to conclude that iPS cells can replace embryonic stem cells," Yamanaka is quoted as saying.

This development is still a long way from leading to therapies. Thomson predicted that iPS cells probably solve problems related to immune rejection, but there's still a lot to be understood about how disease works and how these cells might be introduced to provide treatment. "We have a lot of work to do," he said.

-Greg Dahlmann

Earlier on blog.bioethics.net:
+ Are we in the middle of a shift in stem cell research?

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

The 5 most popular Bioethics News stories from the week of June 9

Here are the most popular Bioethics News items from last week based on average clicks per day: 1. Japan looks to drop a few pounds... (more)

The 5 most popular Bioethics News stories from the week of June 1

Here are the most popular Bioethics News items from last week based on average clicks per day: 1. Race and place (NYT) A study by... (more)

The 5 most popular Bioethics News stories from the week of May 26

Here are the most popular Bioethics News items from last week based on average clicks per day: 1. It matters where you grow up (USA... (more)

Francis Collins: A view from the press room

By Ricki Lewis Francis Collins, the soon-to-be former director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), boldly ventured where not too many scientists dare... (more)

Unintended consequences from GINA?

Many have hailed the passage of the Genetic Information Nondescrimination Act as a major policy advance. And while there are certainly people who will benefit... (more)

this blog's feed

info

archives

tags