AJOB article at center of focus on hospital ethics consultation

American Medical News, an AMA publication, recently took a look at the state of ethics consult services in hospitals -- and it found a lot of unease. Doctors are hesitant to call for ethics consults. Ethics consultants often lack the training and resources to effectively address situations. And among bioethicists, there's uncertainty about whether ethics consults even help. From the article:

The use of ethics consultation services varies widely from hospital to hospital, but physician experts and ethicists agree that they frequently are underused. That leads, they say, to increased medical costs and ugly disputes among physicians, patients and families.

Physicians' reluctance to seek aid when dilemmas arise is partly grounded in the notion that a call for help is equivalent to hauling in the "ethics police." But the problem, experts say, goes far deeper.

Too often, ethics consultants lack the resources, training and mediation skills necessary to resolve disputes and address dilemmas in a timely and effective manner. In addition, the journal article pointed out that fewer than half of consultants have any formal training, and only one in 20 has a bioethics certification or graduate degree.

Moreover, the evidence that ethics consultation actually improves patient outcomes is thin. Many experts are at a loss on how even to go about measuring its impact.

"If ethics committees were a drug," said Howard Brody, MD, PhD, director of the University of Texas Medical Branch's Institute for Medical Humanities, "they would not be approved."

AJOB February 2007 coverThe AMNews piece builds around the February 2007 AJOB cover article "Ethics Consultation in United States Hospitals: A National Survey" by Ellen Fox, Sarah Myers and Robert A. Pearlman. In that article, the authors reported that only 41 percent of ethics consultants had formal training. Ellen Fox, who's director of the VA's National Center for Ethics in Health Care, is now involved in an effort to standardize and measure the work of ethics consultants. From the AMNews piece:

... The VA began the initiative in May 2007. By September of this year, it will record electronically all consultations and their outcomes.

The VA has developed a 63-page primer and two-hour instructional video for its consultants. Ethics coaches will visit VA medical centers to train consultants on consistently following a step-by-step process when handling cases. They will be expected to evaluate their own performance and skills, and physicians and other health professionals will be surveyed for their feedback, said [Ellen Fox] ...

"It is concerning to me that almost 20 years after the Joint Commission mandate, there still are not widely agreed-upon standards for quality," she said. "That's why in the VA we've issued these standards and will hold people accountable for meeting them."

Dr. Fox, lead author of the study in The American Journal of Bioethics, said proof of ethics committees' effectiveness is still largely anecdotal.

"The way to ensure that ethics consultation is utilized at an appropriate level is to ensure that the quality of ethics consultation is very high," she said. "Our strategy is to prove the value of it on the ground."

-Greg Dahlmann

comments

I'd like to see a survey in which these questions are asked, of doctors, administrators, patients, families, the general public:

What do you perceive the role of a hospital-based ethics consultant to be?

Whose interests does the consultant represent?

What can you see yourself asking the consultant for - medical opinion? Legal opinion? Moral opinion? Advice? Mediation? What training would you like to see the consultant have?

I suspect we would find very divergent views and general fuzziness on these, which could explain why consultants don't get used and why the outcomes aren't what they should be.

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags