Not yet a synthetic organism, but closer

A team from the Venter Institute is reporting this week in Science that it has successfully constructed a synthetic genome for the bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium, which they call the "M. genitalium JCVI-1.0 genome." In the paper, the team describes how it assembled "cassettes" of base pairs (basically chunks of DNA made up of about 5000 base pairs) into ever larger sections of the genome before finally assembling the whole sequence in yeast.

So what? Well, theoretically you could use a synthetic genome to act as the "operating system" for new types of organisms. Here's how the Venter Institute's Hamilton Smith describes the next step on the Science podcast:

I like the analogy with the computer. You have an operating system, which by itself doesn't do anything. But when you install it on a computer, then you have a working computer system. It's the same with the genome. The genome is an operating system for a cell and the cytoplasm of the cell is the hardware that's required to run that genome. The two together make a living reproducing cells. So, when we chemically synthesize the genome, it's of no use sitting in a test tube. You have to transplant it into a receptive cytoplasm. Once you do that, then genome is expressed and you have a divided cell ... that's the next big step.

Smith says the Venter team is now focused on stripping the synthetic Mycoplasma genome down to only the genes essential for the microbe's basic function. Then they'll try transplanting that stripped down synthetic genome into cells to see if it works.

-Greg Dahlmann

Earlier on blog.bioethics.net:
+ Craig Venter on the "DNA-driven world"
+ Craig Venter on Stephen Colbert
+ Craig Venter on the ethics of creating synthetic organisms

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Caplan: New Mammogram Recommendations Accurate, but Not Right

While the data may support pushing back the timeline for routine mammograms from age 40 to 50 for women, Arthur Caplan questions the decision in... (more)

Give Me ObamaCare and Give Me Your So-Called "Death Panels." It's Surely Better Than What We Have Now.

The conservative blog, mercatornet.com, invited yours truly to be part of a debate on health reform, the controversy over so called "death panels", and my... (more)

Caplan: Swine Flu Response Isn't Even Worth Sneezing At

For all the planning, prioritizing, and head scratching done by state and federal governments for the coming H1N1 flu crisis this fall, we still have... (more)

The November Issue of AJOB Is Now Online!

With H1N1 and flu vaccines on everyone's minds, the November issue of The American Journal of Bioethics couldn't be more timely. What do people think... (more)

Q & A on What is a Blockbuster Anti-Wrinkle Cream Worth, Morally Speaking
Or How Many Fetuses Does It Take To Make a Great Cosmeceutical

Question: What is it worth to produce a blockbuster anti-wrinkle cream? Hypothetical Answer from Cosmeceutical Company: A single skin biopsy of a 14-week old voluntarily... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags