Not yet a synthetic organism, but closer

A team from the Venter Institute is reporting this week in Science that it has successfully constructed a synthetic genome for the bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium, which they call the "M. genitalium JCVI-1.0 genome." In the paper, the team describes how it assembled "cassettes" of base pairs (basically chunks of DNA made up of about 5000 base pairs) into ever larger sections of the genome before finally assembling the whole sequence in yeast.

So what? Well, theoretically you could use a synthetic genome to act as the "operating system" for new types of organisms. Here's how the Venter Institute's Hamilton Smith describes the next step on the Science podcast:

I like the analogy with the computer. You have an operating system, which by itself doesn't do anything. But when you install it on a computer, then you have a working computer system. It's the same with the genome. The genome is an operating system for a cell and the cytoplasm of the cell is the hardware that's required to run that genome. The two together make a living reproducing cells. So, when we chemically synthesize the genome, it's of no use sitting in a test tube. You have to transplant it into a receptive cytoplasm. Once you do that, then genome is expressed and you have a divided cell ... that's the next big step.

Smith says the Venter team is now focused on stripping the synthetic Mycoplasma genome down to only the genes essential for the microbe's basic function. Then they'll try transplanting that stripped down synthetic genome into cells to see if it works.

-Greg Dahlmann

Earlier on blog.bioethics.net:
+ Craig Venter on the "DNA-driven world"
+ Craig Venter on Stephen Colbert
+ Craig Venter on the ethics of creating synthetic organisms

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags