The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

What President Bush said about stem cells in the State of the Union

Here's the section (whole speech transcript), which also includes mentions of cloning and intellectual property:

On matters of life and science, we must trust in the innovative spirit of medical researchers and empower them to discover new treatments while respecting moral boundaries. In November, we witnessed a landmark achievement when scientists discovered a way to reprogram adult skin cells to act like embryonic stem cells. This breakthrough has the potential to move us beyond the divisive debates of the past by extending the frontiers of medicine without the destruction of human life. (Applause.)

So we're expanding funding for this type of ethical medical research. And as we explore promising avenues of research, we must also ensure that all life is treated with the dignity it deserves. And so I call on Congress to pass legislation that bans unethical practices such as the buying, selling, patenting, or cloning of human life. (Applause.)

The president's comments about expanding funding for research on induced pluripotent stem cells aren't surprising. Back in November, an official from NIH's Stem Cell Task Force was quoted by the San Francisco Chronicle saying that the agency would "be quite enthusiastic" about funding iPS cell research.

The president's call to ban "the buying, selling, patenting, or cloning of human life" also isn't too surprising, but the intellectual property part of that statement is a little vague. Was he referring to patenting the entire genome of an individual person? Because if he was just talking about parts of the human genome, we're already pretty far down that road.

-Greg Dahlmann

comments

Click here to read the response by the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) to Bush's State of the Union Address.

http://isscr.org/press_releases/souresponse.html

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

When the Price at the Pump Begins to Effect Quality Health Care, We Know We Have a Real Problem...

As today's Washington Post article reports on bioethics.net, the recent surge in gas prices is making the cost of providing home health care for... (more)

Where's the Beef...or Should I Say Pork?

With the Food and Drug Administration's most recent approval of an antiwrinkle injectible that will keep a person's face expressionless, an important question must be... (more)

Hello Health Guide, Goodbye Doctor's Waiting Rooms

The US Food and Drug Administration approved Intel's newest healthcare gadget: an in-home health monitoring system for patients with chronic conditions, called Health Guide. While... (more)

Much More Than An Apology

On Thursday, July 10th, the American Medical Association issued an apology for past inequalities in the treatment of African American physicians and patients. This apology... (more)

No to Pens and Yes to Pizza

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Board of Directors have adopted a new code of ethics on interactions with healthcare professionals (bioethics.net News,... (more)

this blog's feed

info

archives

tags