The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Surrogacy without drama

When surrogacy comes up in the media, it's usually within the context of a story about celebrities, outsourced wombs, court cases or comedy. But this past weekend, the Washington Post had the story of a surrogacy gone absolutely, positively... normal. From Brigid Schulte's piece:

Fourteen years ago, Kovacic, a married, middle-class mother of three, signed a $15,000 contract with Carol Van Cleef and Doug Thompson, now of McLean, to carry the embryo that their sperm and egg had created in a petri dish. On her 35th birthday, Kovacic gave birth to Jamie. The two families, without a second thought or a hint of awkwardness, have celebrated together every year since.

In technical terms, Kovacic was a "gestational carrier" for Carol and Doug, the "intended parents." Kovacic, 49, short and easygoing with an impish sense of humor, and Van Cleef, 52, a tall, willowy, self-described type-A partner in a major law firm, couldn't be more different. But theirs is an intimate bond of flesh and bone, forged in science and the ancient yearning for a child that society has yet to find the words to describe, much less understand.

Kovacic, who lives in Herndon, brought two of her own daughters to the birthday dinner. The girls gushed about movies and bands and teased Jamie's 17-year-old brother, Peter. Jamie, sitting between Kovacic and Van Cleef, mentioned that she would be singing soprano in her upcoming chorus concert.

Kovacic looked at Van Cleef and raised an eyebrow. "I know she didn't get that from either one of us, did she?"

Kovacic has been Jamie's "special friend" at preschool. She has attended her graduations, school performances and confirmation. She babysat for her as a child. But the one thing she clearly isn't is Jamie's mother.

One interesting fact from this piece: surrogate births account for less than one percent of all births from reproductive technologies.

-Greg Dahlmann

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

When the Price at the Pump Begins to Effect Quality Health Care, We Know We Have a Real Problem...

As today's Washington Post article reports on bioethics.net, the recent surge in gas prices is making the cost of providing home health care for... (more)

Where's the Beef...or Should I Say Pork?

With the Food and Drug Administration's most recent approval of an antiwrinkle injectible that will keep a person's face expressionless, an important question must be... (more)

Hello Health Guide, Goodbye Doctor's Waiting Rooms

The US Food and Drug Administration approved Intel's newest healthcare gadget: an in-home health monitoring system for patients with chronic conditions, called Health Guide. While... (more)

Much More Than An Apology

On Thursday, July 10th, the American Medical Association issued an apology for past inequalities in the treatment of African American physicians and patients. This apology... (more)

No to Pens and Yes to Pizza

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Board of Directors have adopted a new code of ethics on interactions with healthcare professionals (bioethics.net News,... (more)

this blog's feed

info

archives

tags