Who needs Jenny Craig when you can get slim in Second Life?

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that researchers at the University of Houston's Obesity Research Center is using Second Life to help overweight persons learn about and develop habits for a healthy lifestyle.
second life.jpg
Hmm...now let's see--there would seem to be a trend here. Earlier this week on bioethics.net, we posted a story about pediatric oncology researchers using video games to teach children to be more compliant with their drug therapy. Now, obesity researchers are using Second Life to have people put down the Cheetos and the remote and hop on the treadmill and eat a salad. Undoubtedly, it's a creative idea, and evidently one that many researchers are turning to in using Second Life to conduct research studies, says the SF Chronicle article.

But why people would care more about their avatar than they do their own health in real life? And if they do, how will this help us know what will motivate people in real life to live healthier lifestyles? Unfortunately, unlike in the University of Houston study, in the real world, no one is handing out "Lindens" (the currency of Second Life) or any kind of "brownie points" for being active or eating well.

So, how will the researchers separate out those persons whose avatars are morphing from chunky to slim out of sheer from competitiveness in the online world and those who truly are learning about how to improve their health and would take something away from Second Life?

But I'm still wondering whether this research will actually result in learning about whether people will acquire healthier behaviors in the real world after living online with a healthier slimmer new avatar. If it does work, watch out Jenny Craig--people will be whittling their waistlines with their avatar online for free with Second Life.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Caplan: Zealot's Bad Study Leads Autism Community Astray for A Decade

As Arthur Caplan tells us in this week's MSNBC column, one bad study and a zealot's pursuit of a theory can lead an entire movement... (more)

It's My Baby and I'll Smoke If I Want To! Except Florida.

How far can a court, and by extension the state, go to protect the health and well-being of the unborn? In Florida, it would appear--much... (more)

"Extraordinary Messiness"

Hollywood has taken up orphan diseases before--remember "Lorenzo's Oil"? And bioethics movies generally have been increasingly common, even just in the last year. Think "My... (more)

Ashley X Revisited: Fost and Lantos Debate on the Bioethics Channel

This month's issue of The American Journal of Bioethics features a Target Article by Diekema and Fost articulating their defense of the Ashley X procedures.... (more)

Did Anyone Know It Was National Vaccination Week?

Over on the Practical Bioethics blog, I asked the above question today, based on a story live from Kansas City, MO. The answer: I didn't.... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags