Who needs Jenny Craig when you can get slim in Second Life?

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that researchers at the University of Houston's Obesity Research Center is using Second Life to help overweight persons learn about and develop habits for a healthy lifestyle.
second life.jpg
Hmm...now let's see--there would seem to be a trend here. Earlier this week on bioethics.net, we posted a story about pediatric oncology researchers using video games to teach children to be more compliant with their drug therapy. Now, obesity researchers are using Second Life to have people put down the Cheetos and the remote and hop on the treadmill and eat a salad. Undoubtedly, it's a creative idea, and evidently one that many researchers are turning to in using Second Life to conduct research studies, says the SF Chronicle article.

But why people would care more about their avatar than they do their own health in real life? And if they do, how will this help us know what will motivate people in real life to live healthier lifestyles? Unfortunately, unlike in the University of Houston study, in the real world, no one is handing out "Lindens" (the currency of Second Life) or any kind of "brownie points" for being active or eating well.

So, how will the researchers separate out those persons whose avatars are morphing from chunky to slim out of sheer from competitiveness in the online world and those who truly are learning about how to improve their health and would take something away from Second Life?

But I'm still wondering whether this research will actually result in learning about whether people will acquire healthier behaviors in the real world after living online with a healthier slimmer new avatar. If it does work, watch out Jenny Craig--people will be whittling their waistlines with their avatar online for free with Second Life.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

The November Issue of AJOB Is Now Online!

With H1N1 and flu vaccines on everyone's minds, the November issue of The American Journal of Bioethics couldn't be more timely. What do people think... (more)

Q & A on What is a Blockbuster Anti-Wrinkle Cream Worth, Morally Speaking
Or How Many Fetuses Does It Take To Make a Great Cosmeceutical

Question: What is it worth to produce a blockbuster anti-wrinkle cream? Hypothetical Answer from Cosmeceutical Company: A single skin biopsy of a 14-week old voluntarily... (more)

Bioethics Needs More Than Number Crunchers, says Caplan

Even as one trained in said number or data or fact crunching--whether you want to call us social scientists or empirical bioethicists or what have... (more)

Should Hwang Do Time in the Big House?

For the disgrace and shame he placed upon stem cell research in South Korea and for many stem cell research more generally, he should do... (more)

Is Nanotechnology the Key to Happiness?

Nanotechnology has been called a great many things--the great leveler, the panacea to all that ails the world, the technology that will allow us to... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags