Warnock: Dementia Patients A Waste

Some Brits are shocked at Baroness Mary Warnock's latest quote regarding the significant burden placed on Alzheimer's caregivers and her call for euthanasia for the demented.

warnock203.jpg The St. Louis Examiner reported that she said, "Elderly people with dementia are 'wasting' the lives of those who have to care for them."

Not only are they wasting lives, says Warnock, but they are also wasting resources. Not exactly warm fuzzies from the Baroness. Yet, in a socialized health care system every dollar spent on one person is a dollar not spent on another. Thus, years spent in a demented state means that tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on a demented patient are not spent on essential preventive and life-saving services for children, young adults, and the middle-aged who have a chance of leading longer, healthy, fulfilling lives.

Thought about that way Warnock's argument doesn't seem so harsh. Is Baroness Warnock's position cold-hearted? No. It's practical.

Summer Johnson, PhD

comments

Can't she be both cold-hearted AND practical? The two certainly aren't mutually exclusive.

A lot of things are practical without being moral. China taking organs from executed prisoners to transplant into its citizens is "practical" but it is not moral and I say this as someone on the transplant list for a cadaver kidney. If we have come down to what is practical as the sole basis for decision making we are in sad way.

I doubt that those who actually care for those patients feel that their lives are being wasted. It beats sitting in front of a TV all day and not getting a paycheck, at the very least. And many, hopefully most, of those caregivers do feel that they are doing something worthwhile. Caring for the helpless is a very human thing to do.

Furthermore, if this kind of practicality is the logical and inevitable outgrowth of socialized (think how ironic that word is) medicine, then that's one more reason to fight it at all costs.

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags