Warnock: Dementia Patients A Waste

Some Brits are shocked at Baroness Mary Warnock's latest quote regarding the significant burden placed on Alzheimer's caregivers and her call for euthanasia for the demented.

warnock203.jpg The St. Louis Examiner reported that she said, "Elderly people with dementia are 'wasting' the lives of those who have to care for them."

Not only are they wasting lives, says Warnock, but they are also wasting resources. Not exactly warm fuzzies from the Baroness. Yet, in a socialized health care system every dollar spent on one person is a dollar not spent on another. Thus, years spent in a demented state means that tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on a demented patient are not spent on essential preventive and life-saving services for children, young adults, and the middle-aged who have a chance of leading longer, healthy, fulfilling lives.

Thought about that way Warnock's argument doesn't seem so harsh. Is Baroness Warnock's position cold-hearted? No. It's practical.

Summer Johnson, PhD

comments

Can't she be both cold-hearted AND practical? The two certainly aren't mutually exclusive.

A lot of things are practical without being moral. China taking organs from executed prisoners to transplant into its citizens is "practical" but it is not moral and I say this as someone on the transplant list for a cadaver kidney. If we have come down to what is practical as the sole basis for decision making we are in sad way.

I doubt that those who actually care for those patients feel that their lives are being wasted. It beats sitting in front of a TV all day and not getting a paycheck, at the very least. And many, hopefully most, of those caregivers do feel that they are doing something worthwhile. Caring for the helpless is a very human thing to do.

Furthermore, if this kind of practicality is the logical and inevitable outgrowth of socialized (think how ironic that word is) medicine, then that's one more reason to fight it at all costs.

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Common Ground on Abortion? Not Likely.

President Obama isn't really asking for much. Really it's quite simple: both sides of the issue, conservatives and liberals, must give up a little bit... (more)

Caplan: Think Big on Health Care

Arthur Caplan reminded us last week not to get bogged down in the details and to "think big" on health care. To read more about... (more)

Follow-up on The Wild West of Nanotechnology

Today, The Scientist has revealed more about the scandal involving nanoscientist Chiming Wei which was first written about here on bioethics.net. This scandal has brought... (more)

My Mommy Is My Daddy Is My Mommy

Stem cell research has the potential to change the standard gendered parental relationships by making it possible for women to produce sperm and eggs from... (more)

Be Careful What You Wish For

In collaboration with Nanotech-Now.com and Lifeboat Foundation, Tihamer Toth-Fejel comments as this month's guest columnist about the prospect of a much less ominous future for... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags