23andHerBreasts

On Thursday, 23andMe announced their latest initiative aimed at bringing together the largest cohort of women with breast cancer "to build an infrastructure, based on genetics, that will accelerate consumer-based research of the disease."

23chromosomes.jpg

The women who opt for 23andMe's genetic testing services can opt-in for other kinds of surveys and other kinds of information gathering studies as well as the opportunity to be part of a growing community of women touched by breast cancer.

The ultimate goal, says the company, is to some day have personalized treatments. What the company doesn't say to these women, though, is that this reality is certainly years if not decades away. The real benefits of this "research arm" of 23andMe is most certainly the "community" that this group provides--and these benefits can be quite real. The sense that there is a whole world of women out there going through what these women are, that can share information and experience, is a real benefit of this research--but telling these women that participation in this RESEARCH, not treatment, is nothing more than that.

Providing information to 23andMe will certainly help women in the future be cured and maybe even someday prevent breast cancer. Participants in this research are just as likely to be misled about this as any other kind of population genetics research of this kind. But 23andMe with all its press and with its purported goal to be the largest cohort study in the world should also strive to get the ethics right.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Gingrich on IVF

Scientist, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags