The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics at Loyola University

Female Med Students On Edge? Leave Them Alone

female doctor.jpgIt turns out that female doctors-to-be don't just feel more nervous than their male counterparts but they actually appear more nervous to their patients, says an Indiana University School of Medicine Study.

Published in this month's issue of Patient Education and Counseling, researchers found that this decreased confidence among women is not connected to academic performance, but only clinical performance in undergraduate medical education. Their suggestion? Changes to the medical curriculum to boost fem-docs confidence.

What the study does not reveal is whether the gender gap that exists at the time of training persists beyond med school into residency or actual practice. Moreover, why highlight these differences?

Particularly if this gap represents only a phase during the earliest periods of becoming a physician, singling women out and making them feel as though their increased anxiety, their lesser confidence is a problem to be medicalized and cured like the diseases they study? This approach is completely backward.

These findings are interesting sure--and something for undergraduate medical educators to be aware of and to take account of--but this is not something to "treat" or to change medical education over. Let women be aware of and experience their feelings--they will go on to be doctors who are just as confident, calm, and patient-centered as their male counterparts. That is, unless they are made to feel at the earliest stages of their training, that they are in some way lesser.

Summer Johnson, PhD

comments

I agree with the author. How does one determine that being or appearing more nerveous is a problem? Do doctors who appear more nerveous give inferior medical care? If so, then maybe we should address it. But I believe we should figure that out before we go about trying to correct something that may not even be a problem.

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Art Caplan One of the Smartest People on the Planet?
Discovering Minds Want to Know...

Check out this update from the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics noting that Arthur Caplan has been recognized by Discover Magazine. The article... (more)

Brain Ethics Comes to the Nation's Capital

This Thursday and Friday, November 13th and 14th, the Neuroethics Society will meet in Washington DC at the AAAS Headquarters. According to Martha Farah, Communications... (more)

"Odd" Baby Play = Autism?

A recent study published by the UC Davis MIND Institute has found that infants who repetitively play with toys by spinning them or rattling them... (more)

Crestor for All?

It turns out that not just the high cholesterol crowd benefits from the use of anti-cholesterol medications, in this case Crestor, says Bloomberg. Recent studies... (more)

Caplan on Change Coming for Stem Cells

Arthur Caplan is conjecturing that the battle over stem cells may be coming to an end with the coming Obama administration, on MSNBC.com. Full-text of... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags