Lowering the Exercise Bar, Raising the Numbers on the Scale?

Last week, the DHHS changed the guidelines for physical activity from 30 minutes of moderate activity 5 days a week to just a total of 2 1/2 hours total per week. A reported in the Washington Post, in order to fit into American's busy lifestyles, changing the recommendations means that people can now fit their physical activity into longer sessions and get the same benefits as shorter ones--and still feel as though they are meeting their goals.

jogger.jpg

But what about all the data that suggests that "weekend warriors"--those folks who don't work out all week but then attempt to run 10 miles on the weekend--are prone to more injuries? Or what about the fact that when exercise is not part of a daily routine it is all the easier just to "forget" about it and for it to fall completely out of one's lifestyle?

Moreover, not integrating healthy, routine physical fitness into people's lifestyles suggests that it is just an "every once in a while" thing--and that behavior can ultimately have an effect on the waistline. Not to mention that physical fitness is just one part of a multifaceted puzzle when we are talking about battling the obesity epidemic.

DHHS should think carefully about how they promote this new message about physical fitness for Americans. The impact could be long lasting and permanently seen right around our midsections.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags