Run Away from the Border?

I too want to praise Yum! Brand Foods, right along with the Association of State and Territorial Public Health Officials for its commitment to put nutritional information on its menu boards of Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, KFC, and Long John Silvers restaurants.

chalupa.jpg

Yet, should it really take until January 1, 2011 to make this change? When Taco Bell comes out with its new Volcano Taco all of the Taco Bell menu signs in America change instantly---so what's the hold up with the nutritional numbers?

I really don't need to ask the question though--we all know why the Hut, the Bell, the Colonel, and Long John are going to take so long to put the digits up on the board--we would all be terrified to know at this very moment precisely how many calories are in those Chalupas we down, the stuffed crust pizza we crave, and those fish and chicken planks that call our name from the "drive-thru".

My guess is that Yum! is going to undergo a little "slim-down" before calories get slapped up on the menu boards nationwide. Maybe I'm wrong. But I bet if I knew what I was eating during my late night run for the border I'd think twice and so would you--and that's what Yum! is thinking about, too.

Regardless of how many calories are in your Chalupa, other fast-food chains should follow suit and make nutritional information more accessible than some impossible to find paper menu that you have to hunt down inside the restaurant and no one but the daytime manager knows how to find. All restaurants should plaster their menus with their caloric, fat, and other nutritional info--it's the least they can do to allow their consumers to have the chance to be healthy.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags