Once a Fast Food Junkie, Always a Fast Food Junkie

New child and adolescent heath research suggests that once the fast food industry has you hooked you on commercials for you to "run for the border", you are all the more likely to continue those behaviors into adulthood, says the Washington Post.

060223_KFC_hmed_2p.hmedium.jpgInterestingly enough, however, it's not the actual consumption of these foods in the teenage years that results in adult fast food consumption--but the watching of five or more hours of television per day. The connection? Exposure to fast food television ads that drill into our brains the deliciousness of The Whopper.

The conclusion of the study reported in the post is to reduce television viewing to the AAP recommended 2 hours per day. But absent the television police coming into homes across America and turning off the plasma, can there be a more realistic solution, more consistent with parents' and children's autonomous choices about how and where and when they watch TV?

Perhaps a better solution would be to change the number, frequency and the content of fast food ads during the prime teen television viewing hours to prevent our adolescents from becoming abundant adult fast food consumers. This type of policy changes puts the onus on television networks and the fast food industry, rather than families and children, to advertise in different ways to the individuals who can make autonomous choices about what to eat--adults--rather than bombarding children with messages throughout their childhood and teen years so that before they even reach the age of maturity are completely programmed. Under the current model, by the time they can drive, they are like zombies on autopilot set to drive to the nearest McDonalds to fuel up on superfood.

In one sense, it's easier to recommend to parents to turn off the TV than to get the fast food industry not to advertise or to convince the networks not to run the lucrative ads. On the other hand, the downstream implications of an entire generation who is obese and unhealthy because they were seduced by fast food commercials will pay a pretty great price as well. So the question remains: will we change our advertising policy now or ask our children to pay the price over the long term?

Summer Johnson, PhD

comments

I definitely believe that fast-food corporations and television networks need to be held culpable for propegating their unhealthy products to children through tactfully placed advertisements. Along with aggressive child marketing, McDonald's continues to site their restaurants within close proximity to schools, again, placing more pressure on our children to make the wrong food choices.

http://valuethemeal.blogspot.com

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags