Baby Einstein? Well, Maybe Not So Much.

baby-tv-1.jpgWe already knew that too much television watching was not good for the health of adults and teens and even young children, leading to a more sedentary lifestyle. Plus, it turns many of our brains into gelatin--how else could millions of Americans watch American Idol and The Bachelor?

But how about for your infant? You know, the pre-gelatin brain phase--before years of exposure to modern media, could TV really harm the littlest among us?

Well, recent research reported in the journal Pediatrics suggests that while it may not do immediate harm to infants and toddlers to watch the tube, it also doesn't do anything to help them. So wait, you might say, what about those amazing Baby Einstein DVDs everyone raves about? Sorry, staring at the television in infancy is not associated with better verbal or motor skills at age 3, says these researchers from the Pediatrics study.

But does TV harm infants? This study doesn't offer that conclusion. However, at least one research study, according to TIME Magazine, suggests that DVD watching by infants results in a reduced vocabulary--a whole 6-8 fewer words in their repertoire. Then again, when you are an infant--that could be anywhere from a 5% to a 50% reduction in vocabulary!

The upshot here is that no one is going to haul your baby away to foster care if you set him or her in front of the television while you read a book for 30 minutes or bake a cake, but if your goal is to make your child a genius, clever little DVDs are not the way to do it. Actually reading to and talking to your child is the only proven way to guarantee they will have a strong vocabulary and visual skills as they grow into a child.

Some things just have to be done the old fashioned way.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags