Kids Having Kids...and Adults, Too

For the second year in a row the teenage birth rate has increased, reports the Washington Post.

pregnant-teen.jpg No one is certain as to the reason why, but many are pointing the finger at the abstinence-only sex education programs of the last eight years promoted by the previous Bush administration, stating that they simply do not work. Putting it simply: teenagers will have sex. The key, of course, is teaching them is how to prevent pregnancy, not to prevent sex. The moral responsibility is not to put one's own values on teens and to convince them that premarital sex is bad, but to make sure that if they are going to have sex that they prevent unintended pregnancies.

Interestingly enough is this other statistic from WaPo: "The new statistics also showed that the total number of U.S. births in 2007 -- 4,317,419 -- was the highest on record, surpassing the peak "baby boom" year of 1957." It turns out that not just teens are having babies, but everyone is. Why is this important? Well, in a bad economy and even worse healthcare crisis, we are in the midst of an even bigger baby boom. So if we don't solve the former two problems, who will care for these infants as they grow into children and then adults? And with 1 in 80 white males being diagnosed with autism (to pick just one health condition), and half of the above number (approximately) identifying as such, you do the math....

With headlines every day of patients cutting back on prescription drugs and necessary medical appointments because they cannot afford them, and now a baby makes three? Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me. Babies are supposed to be a blessing, but absent radical healthcare reform and adequate coverage for mommy and baby (and daddy, too), whether the parents are teens, in their 20s, or 40s, it's guaranteed to create huge problems for the family, but also for whatever healthcare system is created.

Anyway you slice it, these new statistics are troubling.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags