Robertson Wants Stem Cells with Longhorns and Lonestars

texas-flag-fixed-sm.jpgOn Wednesday in the Houston Chronicle, John Robertson argues for changes to the law in the Republic of Texas that would allow for embryonic stem cell research. He makes two major claims--first, that the Obama policy represents an emerging national consensus in favor of embryonic stem cell research and that as such Texan stem cell researchers, regardless of what Governor Rick Perry may believe (who opposes embryonic stem cell research), ought to move forward in doing this research in state laboratories.

Moreover, Robertson goes on to argue that Texas law must to be changed so that scientists can actually derive stem cell lines there; current Texas state penal code makes all embryo research illegal because it defines a human being as alive from "fertilization to birth". That puts a pretty big wrinkle in embryo research.

Robertson certainly has it right--without such changes, Texas is likely feel the similar brain drain that the US did on the national scale when embryo research could not be done the last 8 years under the Bush administration. While Robertson does not explicitly mention this fear in his commentary, one cannot help but consider the implication for Texas universities if stem cell lines cannot be created there. Grants will not be able to be written for those institutions and the money will not follow. The implications could be devastating for UT, Baylor College of Medicine, and others. Implicitly, Robertson is making that argument as well. The implications of that could be felt for a very long time.

Perhaps Governor Perry and the legislature will consider that and think twice about stem cells with longhorns and lonestars on them before they continue with the status quo.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags