Want a "Perfect Baby"? You're Gonna Have To Make It The Old-Fashioned Way.

baby.jpgThat's right, Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles, who announced last month that they would be offering PGD for eye and hair color and other cosmetic traits, has now announced via their website that they are backing off of their plans, says Fox News. Some say due to ethical criticism, other believe it may be because they never had the capability to offer trait selection in the first place.

Whatever the reason, one cannot doubt that Steinberg and colleagues certainly benefited from the attention their international clinics received--and that alone may have been the reason that they promoted their new service. Also, one can be assured that parents have asked for trait selection on Glenn McGee's "under the hood" model, but the question is whether Steinberg's clinic promised it to them and whether he and his colleagues could have delivered prior to the media and ethical storm that ensued.

Have no worries though--Fertility Institutes are also running a spring sale on a single cycle of IVF as a deal to their patients in these lean economic times! (I'm not kidding.... and no, I'm not linking to it.)

If you can't have a perfect baby, at least you can try to have one that costs less--apparently.

Summer Johnson, PhD

comments

Perhaps more disturbing is the effort by the Georgia state legislature to impose limits on IVF (GA SB 169). As a part of this effort, they are seeking to define "ex utero embryos as human beings �, so court disputes must be decided in the best interest of the embryo, not either parent fighting over the embryo." Here is a link the the Bioethics Defense Fund website http://www.bdfund.org/octomom.asp The legal and ethical implications of defining ex utero embryos as human beings are enormous.

It is a a great news for parents who wish their child to have certain traits. There is also a possibility of legal and ethical complications.

Joel

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags