7% of Pediatric Hospitals Lacking DCD Policies. Call In the Clinical Ethicists! Wait. We Already Did.

Recent surveys have found that 7% of pediatric hospitals lack a policy regarding the criteria for donating organs after cardiac death, says a recent study published in JAMA, according to Medpage Today. What is perhaps more troubling, according to this research, is among the 93% of hospitals that have policies, there exists a hodgepodge of criteria and policies that fail to address in many cases the key ethical concerns at the heart of the DCD issue.

My favorite finding: 25% of DCD policies in the hospitals surveyed failed to MENTION informed consent. I'm sure they just forgot to write down that slightly important criterion. No big deal, right?

Of course, just because a written policy, per se, does or does not mention a certain issue doesn't mean that something like informed consent doesn't take place. But it does make one more than a little concerned that the hospital in which one's child is being cared for forgot to include one of the central tenets of Western medicine and one of the key aspects of respecting persons and their wishes (even posthumous) in the healthcare setting.

When 25% of hospital ethics committees (who presumably at least help to draft these policies) can forget to mention something as critical as informed consent, one can only wonder: what else did they forget? This study outlines a number of those areas where the variations in policies are quite dramatic. This study highlights the concerns related to not only significant variability in DCD policies but also the quality of hospital ethics committees and their policy formation in pediatric hospitals around the nation.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?

A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to... (more)

Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics

Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world... (more)

Canadians have Bieber Fever...For Organ Donation

Yes, it's true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn't just tweens who are following the pop star, Justin Bieber's, every move.... (more)

Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion

Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as "Mary Moe" who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers... (more)

Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability

The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags