"Hidden Health Taxes" Neither Ethical Nor Sustainable

Health insurance.jpgIt seems as though we don't have much choice when it comes to health care. Either we are going to pay what the most recent research is calling a "hidden health tax" of something on the order of $1,017 per year to cover the health care costs of the uninsured, at least that's what Families USA is telling us (says WSJ) or we can pony up the money through tacking on an additional tax on the goods we routinely buy through something like a Value Added Tax (VAT) like they do in Europe and ensure healthcare for all--no matter what.

It would seem to me that in a democracy we would be better off having an open dialogue about the kinds of taxes we want to pay in order to get the kind of healthcare we want rather than being forced against our will to pay a hidden tax for those who must receive care anyway in emergency rooms because no one will be denied care. De facto, we have universal healthcare and all Americans pay for it via a certain kind of tax--we just do it blindly.

It would seem to me that the time has come for us to open our eyes and to stop paying "hidden taxes" for the absolute worst type of health care possible and to guarantee health for all. Whether we institute some kind of value added tax or some other way of paying for universal access to health care is another matter, but the bottom line is that silently shifting the costs of care for the uninsured to those who can pay is neither ethical nor sustainable. What it will take to make it end is the only remaining question.

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Caplan: New Mammogram Recommendations Accurate, but Not Right

While the data may support pushing back the timeline for routine mammograms from age 40 to 50 for women, Arthur Caplan questions the decision in... (more)

Give Me ObamaCare and Give Me Your So-Called "Death Panels." It's Surely Better Than What We Have Now.

The conservative blog, mercatornet.com, invited yours truly to be part of a debate on health reform, the controversy over so called "death panels", and my... (more)

Caplan: Swine Flu Response Isn't Even Worth Sneezing At

For all the planning, prioritizing, and head scratching done by state and federal governments for the coming H1N1 flu crisis this fall, we still have... (more)

The November Issue of AJOB Is Now Online!

With H1N1 and flu vaccines on everyone's minds, the November issue of The American Journal of Bioethics couldn't be more timely. What do people think... (more)

Q & A on What is a Blockbuster Anti-Wrinkle Cream Worth, Morally Speaking
Or How Many Fetuses Does It Take To Make a Great Cosmeceutical

Question: What is it worth to produce a blockbuster anti-wrinkle cream? Hypothetical Answer from Cosmeceutical Company: A single skin biopsy of a 14-week old voluntarily... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags