Pucker Up!

lipstick.jpgLadies, how much risk of lead exposure would you be willing to undergo for ruby red lips? Is it even something to be concerned about? Well, it depends on who you ask. According to the NYT, a debate is ensuing at the FDA over lead suspected in tubes of women's favorite shades of lip color.

A recent study found that 1/3rd of lipsticks had in excess of the acceptable limit of lead allowed for candy, raising the question of whether women puckering up is putting them at risk for lead exposure. Cosmetics companies blame only the reddest of red shades--many of which they no longer make--and now assure us that it's safe to slather on the lip color. But advocacy groups are not so sure. It might be a good idea for FDA, who is completely lacking in any regulation for lead limits for lipsticks, to develop some guidelines in this area.

But is this really a public health risk? Doesn't most women's lipstick come off on their morning coffee cups long before they have a chance to ingest it any other way? Shouldn't we be more worried that our coffee mugs are going to get lead poisoning rather than ourselves? However, there are those who believe that there is no safe level of lead exposure--and for them, all lipsticks should be right out--at least until the data is in--but that could take years.

To me, this seems like much ado about nothing--or just one more reason to go after the cosmetic industry for a less than minimal risk of exposure for the very same women who may be exposed to lead at work, in their homes, the soil or from the imported Chinese toys with which their children play.

At the very least, until the data is in, there seems to be no reason to toss your gloss--except maybe the reddest of reds. For now, pucker up!

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Caplan: New Mammogram Recommendations Accurate, but Not Right

While the data may support pushing back the timeline for routine mammograms from age 40 to 50 for women, Arthur Caplan questions the decision in... (more)

Give Me ObamaCare and Give Me Your So-Called "Death Panels." It's Surely Better Than What We Have Now.

The conservative blog, mercatornet.com, invited yours truly to be part of a debate on health reform, the controversy over so called "death panels", and my... (more)

Caplan: Swine Flu Response Isn't Even Worth Sneezing At

For all the planning, prioritizing, and head scratching done by state and federal governments for the coming H1N1 flu crisis this fall, we still have... (more)

The November Issue of AJOB Is Now Online!

With H1N1 and flu vaccines on everyone's minds, the November issue of The American Journal of Bioethics couldn't be more timely. What do people think... (more)

Q & A on What is a Blockbuster Anti-Wrinkle Cream Worth, Morally Speaking
Or How Many Fetuses Does It Take To Make a Great Cosmeceutical

Question: What is it worth to produce a blockbuster anti-wrinkle cream? Hypothetical Answer from Cosmeceutical Company: A single skin biopsy of a 14-week old voluntarily... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags