Pucker Up!

lipstick.jpgLadies, how much risk of lead exposure would you be willing to undergo for ruby red lips? Is it even something to be concerned about? Well, it depends on who you ask. According to the NYT, a debate is ensuing at the FDA over lead suspected in tubes of women's favorite shades of lip color.

A recent study found that 1/3rd of lipsticks had in excess of the acceptable limit of lead allowed for candy, raising the question of whether women puckering up is putting them at risk for lead exposure. Cosmetics companies blame only the reddest of red shades--many of which they no longer make--and now assure us that it's safe to slather on the lip color. But advocacy groups are not so sure. It might be a good idea for FDA, who is completely lacking in any regulation for lead limits for lipsticks, to develop some guidelines in this area.

But is this really a public health risk? Doesn't most women's lipstick come off on their morning coffee cups long before they have a chance to ingest it any other way? Shouldn't we be more worried that our coffee mugs are going to get lead poisoning rather than ourselves? However, there are those who believe that there is no safe level of lead exposure--and for them, all lipsticks should be right out--at least until the data is in--but that could take years.

To me, this seems like much ado about nothing--or just one more reason to go after the cosmetic industry for a less than minimal risk of exposure for the very same women who may be exposed to lead at work, in their homes, the soil or from the imported Chinese toys with which their children play.

At the very least, until the data is in, there seems to be no reason to toss your gloss--except maybe the reddest of reds. For now, pucker up!

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

March Issue of AJOB is Now Online!

Trans fat bans, peer recruitment for human subjects research, and the clash of culture versus the rights of physicians are the featured issues in this... (more)

Trans Fats Today. Hot Dogs Tomorrow?

Will banning artificial trans fats today effect your ability to have a hot dog tomorrow? On the The Bioethics Channel, Lorell LaBoube seeks an answer... (more)

Looking for Dr. Right? Get Yours via Speed Date!

Want to find your "Dr. Right"? Now, you can! You can meet your next doctor on a "speed date." Dne Texas hospital is trying its... (more)

End of Life-ology

William King is dying from MS. His two twenty-something sons, Ennis and Malcolm, already lost their mother to cancer 15 years earlier and now must... (more)

If You Are STILL Wondering Why Health Care Reform Is Important...

Check out this statistic from the Chicago Tribune today: "Illinois consumers to pay up to 60% more [for health insurance premiums], data show." When do... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags