Nonsense. It's Good For You.

Who knew that "The Ministry of Silly Walks" and other such absurdities could actually strengthen our brains? Yes, it's true. Nonsense is good for your noggin.

But it isn't just the absurd, but the out of place, the "something that is off" sensor that is tripped in your brain, including a whole range of things from the inane (simple changing of patterns) to the insane (seeing a jackalope, perhaps?) that jars the brain from its normal routine into an entirely new way of thinking, says new research discussed today in the NYT.

0749852143.gifSo why does this matter? It suggests a number of things about the way in which our world ought to be structured if we want our brains to continue riding along the normal neurological highway, producing the same kind of thinking and solutions (or lack thereof to problems). But if in fact we want to jolt our brains into entirely new ways of thinking for the purposes of creative thinking, writing or other endeavors, that is, according to this research, more possible than we believed before. It is, in fact, the notion that putting one's self into a situation where they may encounter the absurd or unusual or simply non-patterned ways of thinking may in fact lead to new ways of seeing the world that is in fact rather revolutionary.

Creativity may follow disorientation. New ideas may follow chaos. Perhaps this should mean that Monty Python should be required viewing for all budding artists, writers, or anyone stuck in a rut?

Summer Johnson, PhD

contribute a comment

Your contributions to the conversation are very much appreciated. We do have a few simple guidelines, though. Be civil. Stay on topic. We reserve the right to remove comments that violate the aforementioned guidelines. One more thing: comments are moderated, so it may take a little while for your comment to be posted. Thanks.

what is this?

A 'Nature Top 50' science blog by the editors, staff and friends of The American Journal of Bioethics. Science writes: "To follow the latest twists in ... science stories with social impact, dive into this Web log"

The original story behind this blog

What people are saying about blog.bioethics.net

recently on blog.bioethics.net

Caplan: New Mammogram Recommendations Accurate, but Not Right

While the data may support pushing back the timeline for routine mammograms from age 40 to 50 for women, Arthur Caplan questions the decision in... (more)

Give Me ObamaCare and Give Me Your So-Called "Death Panels." It's Surely Better Than What We Have Now.

The conservative blog, mercatornet.com, invited yours truly to be part of a debate on health reform, the controversy over so called "death panels", and my... (more)

Caplan: Swine Flu Response Isn't Even Worth Sneezing At

For all the planning, prioritizing, and head scratching done by state and federal governments for the coming H1N1 flu crisis this fall, we still have... (more)

The November Issue of AJOB Is Now Online!

With H1N1 and flu vaccines on everyone's minds, the November issue of The American Journal of Bioethics couldn't be more timely. What do people think... (more)

Q & A on What is a Blockbuster Anti-Wrinkle Cream Worth, Morally Speaking
Or How Many Fetuses Does It Take To Make a Great Cosmeceutical

Question: What is it worth to produce a blockbuster anti-wrinkle cream? Hypothetical Answer from Cosmeceutical Company: A single skin biopsy of a 14-week old voluntarily... (more)

this blog's feed

  • Subscribe
    • XML
    • Google Reader or Homepage
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • Add to My AOL
    • Convert RSS to PDF
    • Add to Technorati Favorites!
    • Add to your phone
    • Get RSS Buttons

info

archives

tags