<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bioethics.net &#187; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioethics.net/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioethics.net</link>
	<description>Where the World Finds Bioethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Caplan: Problems with At Home HIV Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/caplan-problems-with-at-home-hiv-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/caplan-problems-with-at-home-hiv-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV/AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately, at home HIV testing could be an important piece of HIV prevention and treatment. But there are important concerns about ethical gaps in at home testing for HIV says <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/15/11721214-at-home-hiv-test-raises-ethical-questions-bioethicist-says">Arthur Caplan in his post on MSNBC</a>.</p>
<p>Takeaway message: &#8220;Having a home test kit for HIV is a bit like relying on a bathroom scale in the battle against obesity.&#8221; Surely bathroom scales are part of the puzzle for obesity, but a very very small one indeed.</p>
<p>To read more, <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/15/11721214-at-home-hiv-test-raises-ethical-questions-bioethicist-says">click here</a>.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/caplan-problems-with-at-home-hiv-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AJOB: An Independent Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/an_independent_journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/an_independent_journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 23:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheEditors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been implied by Carl Elliott and William Heisel that it has ever been claimed that &#8220;financial links between the Center for Practical Bioethics, <em>AJOB</em> and Purdue Pharma&#8221; exist and that &#8220;what reporters may find is that the center is tied up&#8221; with AJOB.  We hope that our statement below will quell inaccurate speculation and prevent future defamatory statements about AJOB by these two writers or any others who might mistake their statements for facts.</p>
<p>JOURNAL RELATIONSHIPS</p>
<p>No financial relationship exists or ever existed between <em>AJOB</em> and Purdue Pharmaceuticals or any pharmaceutical company.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/an_independent_journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweeting Live Medical Procedures</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/tweeting-live-medical-procedures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/tweeting-live-medical-procedures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 16:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Using Twitter to broadcast a live surgical procedure: educational or ethically dubious? There are obvious concerns with the practice such as the invasion of privacy or potential for error/adverse events due to the broadcast. That said, <a href="http://twitpic.com/photos/houstonhospital">the pictures from the surgery</a> posted on Twitter appear to have no identifying information about thepatient. HIPAA violation unlikely. Others have asked <a href="http://www.boston.com/Boston/dailydose/2012/05/would-you-want-your-surgeon-live-tweet-when-operating/QnQ3lVpv4UwvvO4JP6pdDJ/story.html">whether this creates an unnecessary/unwanted distraction in the surgical suite</a>. Perhaps it could&#8211;but it isn&#8217;t as though the physician is typing on his Blackberry in between sutures.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/tweeting-live-medical-procedures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Dark Side to Facebook&#8217;s Organ Donation Status?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/a-dark-side-to-facebooks-organ-donation-status/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/a-dark-side-to-facebooks-organ-donation-status/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organ Transplant and Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organ donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree, mostly, with <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/01/11486607-for-organ-donation-facebook-beats-the-dmv-bioethicist-says?lite">Art Caplan&#8217;s analysis</a> of Facebook&#8217;s decision to add &#8220;Organ Donor&#8221; as a Life Event on their website. I agree that the DMV is about as poorly suited as a state organization could be to engage with citizens about the possibility of being an organ donor.  <a href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> is undoubtedly the world&#8217;s largest megaphone for raising social awareness about issues&#8211;the media attention alone is likely to spur many Facebook users to think about being an organ donor, and maybe, if we&#8217;re lucky, to have a conversation with friends and family about it.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/05/a-dark-side-to-facebooks-organ-donation-status/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reduce, Reuse&#8230;Re-transplant?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/reduce-reuse-re-transplant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/reduce-reuse-re-transplant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organ Transplant and Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organ donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transplant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is now possible to re-transplant kidneys from a first recipient to a second according to the results of a rare surgical procedure performed at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. According to <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57421818-10391704/after-donated-kidney-fails-doctors-recycle-transplant-in-rare-procedure/">CBS News</a>, this procedure is thought to be the first procedure of this kind done in the U.S. The reason for the experiment? 73,000 people on transplant waiting lists nationwide who wait incredibly long periods of time to receive organs. Reusing previously transplanted organs that are still &#8220;in good shape&#8221; might increase supply.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/reduce-reuse-re-transplant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caplan: Time to Think about IVF Baby Health</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/caplan-time-to-think-about-ivf-baby-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/caplan-time-to-think-about-ivf-baby-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Art Caplan reflects on study published in Fertility and Sterility which indicated that IVF babies have a 37% higher risk of being born with a birth defect compared to naturally conceived children. Caplan concludes in <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/20/11310417-time-to-think-of-health-costs-to-ivf-babies-bioethicist-says">his MSNBC column</a>: &#8220;Infertility treatments have brought a great deal of joy to many.  But, the price is high &#8211; so high that we need to be sure it is a key element in thinking about using these treatments.&#8221;  This this level of risk worth it?&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/caplan-time-to-think-about-ivf-baby-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer Patients Are Mum About Care Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/cancer-patients-are-mum-about-care-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/cancer-patients-are-mum-about-care-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 01:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empirical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/cancer-patients-are-mum-about-care-problems/10882036-scared-adult-man-with-hand-covering-mouth/" rel="attachment wp-att-36368"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-36368" src="http://www.bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/10882036-scared-adult-man-with-hand-covering-mouth-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a>A study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology reports <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/19/health-cancer-care-idUSL3E8FJ0AI20120419">via Reuters Health</a> today that cancer patients rarely tell anyone about the problems with the care they receive. The most common problems? Really not too different from what most seriously ill patients interacting with the healthcare system would gripe about, I imagine. &#8220;Delays in treatment, surgical complications and other issues related to medical care, in addition to communication barriers or breakdown between them and their doctors&#8221; are among the most prominent issues.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/cancer-patients-are-mum-about-care-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feeding Tubes for Brides?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/feeding-tubes-for-brides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/feeding-tubes-for-brides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeding tube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wedding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes doctors engage in questionable practices for the &#8220;good of the patient.&#8221; Think plastic surgeons who enhance breasts to any size to help their patients feel better about their body image. But this latest trend in bridal dieting really takes the (wedding) cake.  Dieting brides-to-be who want to be able to fit into that wedding dress are now using feeding tubes to diet for the big day, says the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/15/fashion/weddings/Losing-Weight-in-Time-for-the-Wedding.html?_r=2&#38;pagewanted=all?src=tp">New York Times</a>. The feeding tubes allow women to be on an 800 calorie diet and go about their day, albeit with a tube up their nose.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/feeding-tubes-for-brides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spoiling for a Fight? Check Out Bioethics.net.</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/spoiling-for-a-fight-check-out-bioethics-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/spoiling-for-a-fight-check-out-bioethics-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB Primary Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics.net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bioethics is increasingly behaving like a Fight Club. Countless scholars wage war in the comment sections on blogs and news stories. Everyone has an opinion as to whether there is a <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&#38;rls=en&#38;q=antemortem+abortion&#38;ie=UTF-8&#38;oe=UTF-8#hl=en&#38;sugexp=frgbld&#38;gs_nf=1&#38;qe=am91cm5hbCBvZiBtZWRpY2FsIGV0aGljcyBhYg&#38;qesig=RLBXeBiHCBklxVjKLED7rA&#38;pkc=AFgZ2tkd5rXxnasNJNzb4e9vHQUBsipb4d_8_HbyhpXwbBfAX8UQ_PKP7yKgPDXSvEPv87kZyBdtMKmBOeKiVS3nTSNa_k4p-g&#38;pq=antemortem%20abortion&#38;cp=28&#38;gs_id=38&#38;xhr=t&#38;q=journal+of+medical+ethics+abortion&#38;pf=p&#38;client=safari&#38;rls=en&#38;sclient=psy-ab&#38;oq=journal+of+medical+ethics+ab&#38;aq=0&#38;aqi=g1g-j1g-b2&#38;aql=&#38;gs_l=&#38;pbx=1&#38;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&#38;fp=f85e188e4be29462&#38;biw=1266&#38;bih=503">&#8220;new ethics of abortion&#8221;</a> or whether &#8220;anonymous fathers&#8221; are a problem.  Want to get in on bioethics&#8217; sparring? Now you can do it right here at bioethics.net.  Let us know what you think about the <a href="http://www.bioethics.net/articles/the-case-for-a-parental-duty-to-use-preimplantation-genetic-diagnosis-for-medical-benefit/">obligation to use PGD in IVF</a> or whether you think it is <a href="http://www.bioethics.net/articles/swabbing-students-should-universities-be-allowed-to-facilitate-educational-dna-testing/">okay to swab undergraduate college students for use in genetic research.</a>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/spoiling-for-a-fight-check-out-bioethics-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Most Interesting Neuroethicist and Philosopher You&#8217;ve Never Met.</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/the-most-interesting-neuroethicist-and-philosopher-youve-never-met/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/the-most-interesting-neuroethicist-and-philosopher-youve-never-met/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neuroethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/the-most-interesting-neuroethicist-and-philosopher-youve-never-met/jason-facing-camera-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-36281"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-36281 alignright" src="http://www.bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Jason-facing-camera1-150x89.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="89" /></a><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/12/04/a-timothy-leary-for-the-viral-video-age/255691">The Atlantic</a> calls him &#8220;a Timothy Leary for the Viral Video age.&#8221; Jason Silva is a self-proclaimed &#8220;performance philosopher&#8221; who presents novel ideas and even more cutting-edge messaging about biotechnology, neuroscience and bioethics. Silva argues that &#8220;philosophical ideas are diluted by their academic packaging&#8221; and that academics don&#8217;t know anything about packaging. He&#8217;s probably right. We could all help ourselves and our scholarship and our ideas if we thought as much about the medium as the message.</p>
<p>Summer Johnson McGee, PhD&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/the-most-interesting-neuroethicist-and-philosopher-youve-never-met/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caplan on Prescription Drug Abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/caplans-position/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/caplans-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain and Palliative Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today Art Caplan, <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/10/11105246-opinion-its-time-to-hold-doctors-accountable-for-painkiller-abuse?lite">in his MSNBC column</a>, discusses the epidemic of prescription drug abuse in this country. But his conclusions would have a chilling effect upon physicians.  He concludes, &#8220;Shouldn’t we create a public policy and legal doctrine that hold accountable those doctors who prescribe these potent painkillers indiscriminately?  Of course we should. The problem, of course, is that creating policy that is designed to catch the &#8220;bad apples&#8221; in medicine so far in the US has had the effect of treating every physician who prescribes opioids and other pain medication in the US like they are a criminal.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/caplans-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Octomom: &#8220;I Goofed.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/octomom-i-goofed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/octomom-i-goofed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[octomom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/09/octomom-admits-in-vitro-fertilization-was-a-mistake/">LifeNews.com,</a> Nadya Suleman admits that she made a mistake by undergoing an IVF procedure that resulted in the conception and birth of 8 children at once. As the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/nadya-octomom-suleman-admits-ivf-fertility-treatments-a-mistake-article-1.1058240?localLinksEnabled=false">New York Daily News reports</a>, &#8220;The mother of 14, who recently posed nude to earn rent money for her family, has revealed she thinks it was a bad decision to undergo fertility treatments after already having six babies.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/octomom-i-goofed/image-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-36217"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-36217" src="http://www.bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/image-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>Finally! She has seen the light! But wait, didn&#8217;t she already say this?&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/octomom-i-goofed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are &#8220;Anonymous Fathers&#8221; Really a Problem?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/are-anonymous-fathers-really-a-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/are-anonymous-fathers-really-a-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Center for Bioethics and Culture continues its crusade against artificial reproduction; this time the target is sperm donation.  Its recent film <a href="http://www.anonymousfathersday.com/">Anonymous Father&#8217;s Day</a> argues that using a sperm donor to conceive causes serious emotional impact on children of sperm donors from not knowing anything about their biological fathers&#8221; It is described as a &#8220;secret&#8221;  akin to a time bomb waiting to go off. They bemoan that a <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/09/british-sperm-bank-owner-may-have-fathered-600-children/">British scientist may have fathered over 600 children via his fertility clinic</a>.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/are-anonymous-fathers-really-a-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh The Places You&#8217;ll Go! (At Dartmouth Medical School)</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/oh-the-places-youll-go-at-dartmouth-medical-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/oh-the-places-youll-go-at-dartmouth-medical-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dartmouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-36165" src="http://www.bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/seuss_dartmouth_custom-300x179.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="179" />A few things we do know about <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/04/05/150074545/seuss-medical-schoolseuss-medical-school?ft=1&#38;f=1128&#38;sc=tw">the newly renamed Dartmouth Medical School</a>:</p>
<p>The cafeteria will serve only &#8220;Green Eggs and Ham&#8221;.  &#8221;Hop on Pop&#8221; will be the diagnosis for Sam I am. The hospital ethicists will argue, &#8220;If I Ran The Zoo&#8221;&#8230; And the star-bellied Sneetches will room together whether they have one star, no stars or two.</p>
<p>(For a much longer and more creative set of rhymes and more detail about this story, <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/04/05/150074545/seuss-medical-schoolseuss-medical-school?ft=1&#38;f=1128&#38;sc=tw">click here</a>.)</p>
<p>Summer Johnson McGee, PhD</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/oh-the-places-youll-go-at-dartmouth-medical-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Criminal Background Checks for Doctors Justified?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/are-criminal-background-checks-for-doctors-justified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/are-criminal-background-checks-for-doctors-justified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to determine which is more concerning: the fact that state medical boards are now doing background checks on their physicians or that prior experience suggests that they have to in order to protect public safety.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2012/04/02/prsa0402.htm">American Medical News</a>, 2/3rds of state medical boards are now conducting criminal background checks on their members. The goal? Physicians with a criminal record can &#8220;be denied a license, have restrictions placed on their practice or face no repercussions, depending on the will of the board in a particular state.&#8221;</p>
<p>Furthermore, AAMC has suggested since 2006 that all medical school applicants have criminal background checks and now 102 or 137 run those checks as part of the admissions process.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/are-criminal-background-checks-for-doctors-justified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam: Fr. Kevin O&#8217;Rourke</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/in-memoriam-fr-kevin-orourke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/in-memoriam-fr-kevin-orourke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end of life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loyola University Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://www.bioethics.lumc.edu/about_the_institute/people/ORourke_06.html">From the Loyola University Chicago Neiswanger website:</a></p>
<p align="left">Kevin O’Rourke, O.P., J.C.D., S.T.M., Dominican priest, canon lawyer, and health care ethicist died on Wednesday.  He is one of the seminal figures in Roman Catholic health care ethics in the United States. He is the author of numerous articles but his best-known publications are text books, especially a co-authored work (with Benedict Ashley, O.P.) published by Georgetown University Press, <em>Health Care Ethics: A Theological Analysis</em>, fourth ed. (2007). He has been a leader in promoting respect for patients and their families to refuse unwanted and burdensome treatment at the end of life.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/04/in-memoriam-fr-kevin-orourke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dukan Diet Doctor Proposal May Be Extreme, But Isn&#8217;t Entirely Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/dukan-diet-doctor-proposal-may-be-extreme-but-isnt-entirely-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/dukan-diet-doctor-proposal-may-be-extreme-but-isnt-entirely-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Dukan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=36065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A controversial diet guru in France, <a href="http://www.dukandiet.co.uk/">Dr. Pierre Dukan</a>, has raised a lot of eyebrows and ire for proposing that all high-school students in France, in order to graduate, pass a weight exam. And Dr. Dukan doesn&#8217;t mean weights and measures or conversions from grams to pounds. He means beating the battle of the bulge or being skinny enough to leave high school in France.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-36066" src="http://www.bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/p_dukan.gif" alt="" width="177" height="295" />Dr. Dukan, under <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/03/27/dukan-diet-guru-faces-ethics-hearing/">ethics investigation for some of his practices</a> such making too much money off of his diet plan, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17516103">say French officials</a>, and ignoring the ethics rule that &#8220;doctors must consider the impact of their comments on the public&#8221;.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/dukan-diet-doctor-proposal-may-be-extreme-but-isnt-entirely-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The March Issue of AJOB is Now Online</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/the-march-issue-of-ajob-is-now-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/the-march-issue-of-ajob-is-now-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=35844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bioethics.net">The American Journal of Bioethics</a> is proud to announce that its March issue, a special issue discussing issues related to lying in medicine, is <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uajb20/current">now available online</a>.</p>
<p>In this issue Samia Hurst and <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/action/doSearch?action=runSearch&#38;type=advanced&#38;result=true&#38;prevSearch=%2Bauthorsfield%3A(Tavaglione%2C+Nicolas)">Nicolas Tavaglione</a> discuss when it is permissible for physicians to lie on behalf of their patients. For example, in cases where insurance coverage is key to gaining access to needed therapy, a physician may, rightfully on Tavaglione and Hurst&#8217;s view, bend the truth to ensure that the patient has access to care.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/the-march-issue-of-ajob-is-now-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Our New Co-Editor-in-Chief, Summer Johnson McGee, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-co-editor-in-chief-summer-johnson-mcgee-phd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-co-editor-in-chief-summer-johnson-mcgee-phd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=35791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bioethics.lumc.edu/about_the_institute/people/Johnson-McGee_12.html">Dr. Summer Johnson McGee</a> graduated from Indiana University with two Bachelor of Arts degrees, Summa Cum Laude in Philosophy and in Bioethics, the latter an individualized major she designed, for which she received the Richard D. Young Award for Development of a New Major (2003) and the Herman B. Wells Most Outstanding Senior Award from the Chancellor of IU. She simultaneously completed undergraduate training in Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Worcester College, Oxford University in 2001-2002. At IU she received the <a href="http://www.lillyendowment.org/ed_csp.html">Lilly Community Endowment Fellowship </a>(4 years), and was Chancellor&#8217;s Scholar, Dean&#8217;s List (all semesters), Phi Beta Kappa, Golden Key, and Phi Eta Sigma.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-co-editor-in-chief-summer-johnson-mcgee-phd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Our New Book Review Editor, Daniel S. Goldberg, JD, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-book-review-editor-daniel-s-goldberg-jd-phd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-book-review-editor-daniel-s-goldberg-jd-phd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical humanities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=35698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We are also pleased to announce that Daniel S. Goldberg of East Carolina University has joined our editorial group as book review editor. We look forward to working with Daniel in the coming years to continue our strong history of publishing thoughtful reviews of bioethics books.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Daniel S. Goldberg</strong></p>
<p>Daniel S. Goldberg is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioethics &#38; Interdisciplinary Studies in the Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University.  He holds a B.A. with honors in philosophy from Wesleyan University, and received his J.D.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-book-review-editor-daniel-s-goldberg-jd-phd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Our New Associate Editor, Kayhan Parsi, JD PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-associate-editor-kayhan-parsi-jd-phd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-associate-editor-kayhan-parsi-jd-phd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kayhan Parsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=35602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left" align="center">AJOB is proud to have Kayhan Parsi as our new Associate Editor.  Kayhan has worked with AJOB closely for the last three years serving as its Book Review Editor. We chose Kayhan, in part, because he knows AJOB well and because he is well connected to scholars throughout bioethics, particularly in the fields of medical professionalism, global health, and medical humanities.  We look forward to continuing our relationship with Kayhan here at AJOB for many years to come.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Kayhan Parsi, JD, PhD</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://bioethics.lumc.edu/about_the_institute/people/Parsi_06.html">Kayhan Parsi, JD, PhD</a> is an Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director at the Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.  He also teaches in the medical school and serves on the ethics committee and ethics consultation service of Loyola.  He has published in a variety of areas and has interests in medical ethics education, professionalism and professional ethics, global health, media and bioethics, and the history of medicine and bioethics.  He co-edited <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Healing-Vocation-Professionalism-Practicing-Bioethics/dp/0742534065">Healing as Vocation: A Medical Professionalism Primer</a></em> (Rowman and Littlefield, 2006).  He has been the book review editor for the American Journal of Bioethics since 2009.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/03/meet-our-new-associate-editor-kayhan-parsi-jd-phd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Our New Associate Editor, Richard Sharp, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/meet-our-new-associate-editor-richard-sharp-phd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/meet-our-new-associate-editor-richard-sharp-phd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sharp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=35599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left" align="center">The AJOB Editorial Office is proud to announce its has added five new members to its editorial group.  Over the next few days, we will introduce the members of our new editorial group to you, including our new co-Editors in Chief, our two new Associate Editors and our new Book Review Editor.</p>
<p style="text-align: left" align="center">One of our new Associate Editors is Richard Sharp, PhD of Cleveland Clinic. We selected Rich because of his scholarship in genetics, new technologies, enhancement and other cutting edge areas in bioethics.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/meet-our-new-associate-editor-richard-sharp-phd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Magnus Corrects the Record Regarding AJOB</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/david-magnus-corrects-the-record-regarding-ajob/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/david-magnus-corrects-the-record-regarding-ajob/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Magnus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=35527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past couple of weeks, a great deal of drama has played out regarding changes at the American Journal of Bioethics. While we appreciate all of the support we have received from our Editorial Board and much of the leadership in the field, a number of misleading or false claims have been made about which I feel obligated to respond.</p>
<ol>
<li>It has been claimed that the Editorial offices of AJOB were relocated to Celltex. This is false. It is a matter of public record that the offices of the journal have been and continue to be based at 3030 Post Oak Blvd.</li>&#8230;</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/david-magnus-corrects-the-record-regarding-ajob/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For The Record: A Response from The Editors of AJOB</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/for-the-record-a-response-from-the-editors-of-ajob/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/for-the-record-a-response-from-the-editors-of-ajob/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Magnus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/?p=34714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To the readers of <a href="http://bioethics.net/">bioethics.net</a>, the bioethics community, and the general public:</p>
<p>As our publisher, Taylor and Francis, has announced, Glenn McGee has stepped down at Editor-in-Chief of AJOB. Upon making the decision to take a position in the private sector, Glenn made a recommendation to the publisher that one of us (David Magnus, co-Editor of AJOB), be promoted to Editor in Chief. He agreed, but only on the condition that Summer Johnson McGee, then Executive Editor of AJOB, be made the co-Editor-in-Chief with him.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/for-the-record-a-response-from-the-editors-of-ajob/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the New Bioethics.net!</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/welcome-to-the-new-bioethics-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/welcome-to-the-new-bioethics-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smcgee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn McGee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/?p=30618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-35210" src="http://bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/twitter_icon_reasonably_small.png" alt="" width="128" height="128" />Completely integrated with the most up-to-date social networking software and other new features, this website makes it even easier and more fun to find today&#8217;s bioethics news, jobs, events, and commentary.</p>
<p>Our site is now also home to all three of the journals in the AJOB family: <em>The American Journal of Bioethics</em> (AJOB), <em>AJOB Neuroscience</em> and <em>AJOB Primary Research</em>.</p>
<p>Visit our &#8220;Hot Topics&#8221; section to learn all you want about any given topic in bioethics including bioterrorism, organ donation and transplantation, public health and much much more.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/welcome-to-the-new-bioethics-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Hope a Culprit in Cancer Clinical Trials?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/is-hope-a-culprit-in-cancer-clinical-trials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/is-hope-a-culprit-in-cancer-clinical-trials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/?p=29325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bioethics.net/2012/02/is-hope-a-culprit-in-cancer-clinical-trials/cancercare_elderlymandoctor/" rel="attachment wp-att-29326"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-29326" title="CancerCare_ElderlyManDoctor" src="http://bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CancerCare_ElderlyManDoctor-300x157.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="157" /></a>A recent study conducted by Emory University School of Medicine found that therapeutic misconception is alive and well in Phase I cancer research. According to <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/sns-rt-us-cancer-trial-participantstre8182kz-20120209,0,681736.story">the Chicago Tribune</a>, &#8220;people enrolled in early stage trials for possible cancer treatments may underestimate the risks involved and overestimate the potential benefits.&#8221;</p>
<p>The culprit: hope. Yes, that&#8217;s right. Plain unabashed optimism. As one of the study authors Rebecca Pentz describes it: &#8220;When participants describe the risks and benefits of participating in the trial, they may use their descriptions to stay hopeful.&#8221; That blasted hopefulness is clouding people&#8217;s understanding of research risk and benefit.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/is-hope-a-culprit-in-cancer-clinical-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich on IVF: Bad for Families, Bad for Bioethics</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/gingrich-on-ivf-bad-for-families-bad-for-bioethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/gingrich-on-ivf-bad-for-families-bad-for-bioethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assisted reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2012/02/gingrich-on-ivf-bad-for-families-bad-for-bioethics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Scientists, reproductive specialists and andrologists had better prepare. If Newt Gingrich has his way (and wins the Presidency), he will have a whole new world in store for science and medicine. </p>
<p>Newt has revived the embryo debate in Republican politics, giving bioethicists a &#8220;walk-on role&#8221; as <a href="http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/bioethics/bioethics_article/9913">Michael Cook explains it</a>. How successful he will be on keeping it on the radar is another issue altogether. It is just as likely that Newt may have just been pandering to the audience at the Exciting Idlewild Baptist Church in Florida, trying to secure votes that clearly were <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/campaigns/florida-primary-offers-a-big-prize-for-winner-with-polls-showing-thats-likely-to-be-romney/2012/01/31/gIQAA4wEeQ_story.html?tid=pm_politics_pop">not enough to win the Florida Primary</a>.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/02/gingrich-on-ivf-bad-for-families-bad-for-bioethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadians have Bieber Fever&#8230;For Organ Donation</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/canadians-have-bieber-feverfor-organ-donation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/canadians-have-bieber-feverfor-organ-donation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organ Transplant and Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Bieber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organ donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Johnson McGee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2012/01/canadians-have-bieber-feverfor-organ-donation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true. Bieber Fever has spread far and wide. But it isn&#8217;t just tweens who are following the pop star, <a href="http://twitter.com/justinbieber">Justin Bieber&#8217;s</a>, every move. Apparently his Twitter feed has quite an effect on his fellow Canadians in regard to organ donation.</p>
<p>Capitalizing on the young star&#8217;s success, Helene Campbell, 20, asked him to Tweet about the Trillium Gift of Life Network to incentivize signing up for being an organ donor, says <a href="http://arts.nationalpost.com/2012/01/23/justin-bieber-tweet-leads-to-rise-in-organ-donation-registrations/">Canada&#8217;s National Post</a>.</p>
<form></form>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-35016" src="http://bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/images1.jpeg" alt="" width="204" height="247" />And shockingly, it worked.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/canadians-have-bieber-feverfor-organ-donation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caplan: Say No to Sterilization, Forced Abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/caplan-say-no-to-sterilization-forced-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/caplan-say-no-to-sterilization-forced-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental illness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2012/01/caplan-say-no-to-sterilization-forced-abortion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Art Caplan discusses a troubling case regarding a 32-year-old pregnant woman known as &#8220;Mary Moe&#8221; who is pregnant for the third time and who suffers from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. </p>
<p>Can the court require her to have an abortion? Ought someone prevent Mary from having sex? </p>
<p>These questions and more are raised by <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/19/10194487-sterilization-forced-abortion-are-never-the-answer-bioethicist-says">Caplan&#8217;s provocative piece on MSNBC</a>. To read it <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/19/10194487-sterilization-forced-abortion-are-never-the-answer-bioethicist-says">click here</a>. </p>
<p>Summer Johnson McGee, PhD&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/caplan-say-no-to-sterilization-forced-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rallying Around Amelia: A Debate on Disability</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/rallying-around-amelia-a-debate-on-disability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/rallying-around-amelia-a-debate-on-disability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organ Transplant and Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Magnus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organ transplants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2012/01/rallying-around-amelia-a-debate-on-disability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The blogosphere and the airwaves are filled with indignation regarding what has happened to <a href="http://yourlife.usatoday.com/parenting-family/special-needs/story/2012-01-16/Team-Amelia-backs-transplant-for-special-needs-child/52603482/1">Amelia Rivera, a three year old who has a rare genetic disorder called Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome</a>. Amelia needs a kidney transplant, but physicians at Children&#8217;s Hospital of Philadelphia have denied her access due to her mental impairment. The discussion held in a conference room at the hospital is recounted in detail by <a href="http://www.wolfhirschhorn.org/2012/01/amelia/brick-walls/">Amelia&#8217;s mother, Chrissy, on her blog</a>. </p>
<p>Parents of special needs children around the world are outraged not only for Amelia but at the notion that health care providers, even at one of the best children&#8217;s hospitals in the world, might arbitrarily decide to deny children treatment on the basis of their mental status.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/rallying-around-amelia-a-debate-on-disability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Fit, For Your Corpse&#8217;s Sake</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/get-fit-for-your-corpses-sake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/get-fit-for-your-corpses-sake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organ Transplant and Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadavers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organ donation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2012/01/get-fit-for-your-corpses-sake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<form mt:asset-id="392" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="youre_fat-12294.jpg" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/youre_fat-12294.jpg" width="221" height="306" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></form>
<p>Art Caplan reminds us in <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/09/10073445-a-final-reason-to-lose-weight?mid=575398">his column on MSNBC.com</a> that its good to be skinny, whether dead or alive. The negative health consequences of obesity experienced during life linger on well into death, especially for those who want to donate their bodies to science. Does this create a moral obligation to shed pounds? Perhaps. If we want medical students to have cadavers and crash-test dummies. </p>
<p>To read more about Art&#8217;s position on the issue, <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/09/10073445-a-final-reason-to-lose-weight?mid=575398">click here</a>. </p>
<p>Summer Johnson McGee, PhD&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/get-fit-for-your-corpses-sake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam&#8211;Bernard Gert</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/in-memoriambernard-gert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/in-memoriambernard-gert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2012/01/in-memoriambernard-gert/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We sadly note the passing of philosopher and bioethicists, Bernard &#8220;Bernie&#8221; Gert.  Bernie was also a member of <a href="http://asbh.org">American Society for Bioethics and Humanities</a> and received its Lifetime Achievement Award in 2006.  He will be missed by all.  </p>
<p>His obituary is below. </p>
<p>Summer Johnson McGee, PhD</p>
<p><small>Bernard Gert, Stone Professor of Intellectual and Moral Philosophy, Emeritus, died on the evening of Saturday the 24th of December at the UNC Hospital.  He was 77.<br />
Bernard &#8211; Bernie to his friends and family &#8211; was arguably the greatest moral philosopher of the 20th century.</small>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/01/in-memoriambernard-gert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Fat Cannot Make You Unfit to Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/why-fat-cannot-make-you-unfit-to-parent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/why-fat-cannot-make-you-unfit-to-parent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/11/why-fat-cannot-make-you-unfit-to-parent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An eight-year-old Cleveland Heights, Ohio boy has been taken away from his parents by Child Protective Services. An unfortunate, but routine occurrence in the world of CPS&#8211;but this time the case has an usual cause&#8212;this third grader weighs more than 200 pounds and in the judgement of some Cuyahoga County officials his parents are the cause of his abuse to his health and well-being. </p>
<p>But as the <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/parents/index.ssf/2011/11/is_obesity_cause_enough_to_tak.html">Cleveland Plain Dealer asked this week</a>, &#8220;Is Obesity Cause Enough To Take Kids From Parents?&#8221; My answer is absolutely no.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/why-fat-cannot-make-you-unfit-to-parent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November Issue of AJOB is Now Available Online!</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/november-issue-of-ajob-is-now-available-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/november-issue-of-ajob-is-now-available-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/11/november-issue-of-ajob-is-now-available-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<form class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"></form>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-35140" title="11" src="http://www.bioethics.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/11.jpeg" alt="" width="202" height="255" />This month&#8217;s issue of The American Journal of Bioethics is now <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uajb20/current">available online</a>. Research ethics is featured prominently in this issue with Rosamond Rhodes et al arguing for <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15265161.2011.615588">a new category of research risk</a> and <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15265161.2011.603794">an article about the recruitment of research participants</a>.</p>
<p>In addition, <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15265161.2011.603793">John Lantos and William Meadow</a> discuss the ethics of the &#8220;slow code.&#8221; Hence the picture of a snail on our November cover!</p>
<p>Also, this month all of this content is <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uajb20/11/11">FREE from our publisher</a>.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/november-issue-of-ajob-is-now-available-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam: Bioethics Pioneer, Erich Loewy, Dies at 83</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/in-memoriam-bioethics-pioneer-erich-loewy-dies-at/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/in-memoriam-bioethics-pioneer-erich-loewy-dies-at/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/11/in-memoriam-bioethics-pioneer-erich-loewy-dies-at/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A bioethics pioneer within his institution, the country and worldwide, Dr. Erich Loewy changed bioethics in innumerable ways.  HIs emphasis on justice in healthcare was evident in his national and international work on the role of the physician in health and health care, rationing and more. His service to the bioethics community was extensive&#8211;as a leader in SSHV, on numerous editorial boards, and serving as an editor of <a href="http://www.springer.com/philosophy/epistemology+and+philosophy+of+science/journal/11017">Theoretical Medicine</a>.  </p>
<p>Loewy&#8217;s life has been described as nothing short of &#8220;remarkable.&#8221; He certainly had a remarkable impact on our field.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/11/in-memoriam-bioethics-pioneer-erich-loewy-dies-at/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food Fight: Industry versus the IOM</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If we are what we eat, shouldn&#8217;t we know what we are, in fact, eating? This simple idea may be much harder to support than one would guess thanks to lobbying on the part of the food industry, says <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/20/8418226-know-what-youre-eating-not-if-food-industry-has-its-way">Arthur Caplan in his MSNBC column today</a>. </p>
<p>As <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/20/8418226-know-what-youre-eating-not-if-food-industry-has-its-way">Caplan explains</a>, an IOM report released today recommended the simplification of food labels so that consumers can with a passing glance know the nutritional value (or lack thereof) in the food we eat.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skin Cancer, Your Hairdresser and You</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/skin-cancer-your-hairdresser-and-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/skin-cancer-your-hairdresser-and-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/skin-cancer-your-hairdresser-and-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Public health experts are arguing to enlist an unlikely set of professionals in the fight against and early detection of skin cancer. Hairdressers. That&#8217;s right: your stylist just might save your life. </p>
<form mt:asset-id="388" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="HairStylist-article.jpg" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HairStylist-article.jpg" width="300" height="412" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></form>
<p>As <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/10/18/141432759/how-hairdressers-can-help-fight-skin-cancer">NPR&#8217;s Booster Shots blog put it</a>&#8211;who spends more time looking at the back of your head, neck and face on a monthly or bi-monthly basis than your hair stylist?  Teaching beauty professionals to look for changes in one&#8217;s scalp, neck or face could be an easy way to integrate early detection into routine beauty regimens.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/skin-cancer-your-hairdresser-and-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arthur Caplan Says &#8220;No&#8221; To Prisoner Organs</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/arthur-caplan-says-no-to-prisoner-organs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/arthur-caplan-says-no-to-prisoner-organs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organ Transplant and Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organ donation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/arthur-caplan-says-no-to-prisoner-organs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<form mt:asset-id="387" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="11.10 small.jpg" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/11.10%20small.jpg" width="99" height="125" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></form>
<p>In the October 2011 issue of AJOB, Arthur Caplan argues in his Target Article &#8220;The Use of Prisoners as Sources of Organs-An Ethically Dubious Practice&#8221; that the great demand for cadaveric organs for donation around the world does not justify harvesting them from prisoners. </p>
<p>To learn more about Dr. Caplan&#8217;s position, listen to <a href="http://hw.libsyn.com/p/5/4/e/54edd2b7c8839fbc/FINAL.Caplan3.101111.mp3?sid=cf16fc0b61e3169576b351d462527ee5&#038;l_sid=24133&#038;l_eid=&#038;l_mid=2742608">his podcast from the Bioethics Channel</a> and read <a href="http://bioethics.net/journal/j_articles.php?aid=2637">his article on bioethics.net</a>.</p>
<p>Summer Johnson McGee, PhD &#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/arthur-caplan-says-no-to-prisoner-organs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://hw.libsyn.com/p/5/4/e/54edd2b7c8839fbc/FINAL.Caplan3.101111.mp3?sid=cf16fc0b61e3169576b351d462527ee5&amp;l_sid=24133&amp;l_eid=&amp;l_mid=2742608" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://hw.libsyn.com/p/5/4/e/54edd2b7c8839fbc/FINAL.Caplan3.101111.mp3?sid=cf16fc0b61e3169576b351d462527ee5&amp;l_sid=24133&amp;l_eid=&amp;l_mid=2742608" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genetic Testing for the Injury Prone</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/genetic-testing-for-the-injury-prone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/genetic-testing-for-the-injury-prone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/genetic-testing-for-the-injury-prone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Professional soccer teams (football to the rest of the world) are using high-powered science to give them a competitive edge. The most recent venture into the world of professional sport and science involves an &#8220;unnamed Premier League club&#8221; [that] has commissioned Yale University scientists to genetically test its players and attempt to identify genetic indicators that can serve as a warning sign to whether an athlete is prone to injury.&#8221; According to <a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/899415-science-in-football-genetic-testing-to-identify-injury-prone-players">Bleacher Report</a>, scientists claim that there are more than 100 genetic factors linked to being prone to injury.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/genetic-testing-for-the-injury-prone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving the USPS by Cutting Healthcare Costs?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/saving-the-usps-by-cutting-healthcare-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/saving-the-usps-by-cutting-healthcare-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Insurance and Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/saving-the-usps-by-cutting-healthcare-costs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What does the postal service have to do with healthcare? Sure, the USPS delivers medical supplies to individuals and organizations. But that is not the connection that the nation&#8217;s postmaster general is making between healthcare and the viability of the postal service. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/post/health-care-is-making-the-postmaster-general-angry/2011/10/09/gIQAxMKGZL_blog.html">WaPo</a>, curing the USPS&#8217;s ills could be as simple as giving its workers and retirees a new health plan, one that isn&#8217;t foisted upon them by the federal government. The Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan (FEHBP), he argues, is just too costly for the USPS.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/saving-the-usps-by-cutting-healthcare-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Would You Put in the Bioethics &#8220;Hall of Fame&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/who-would-you-put-in-the-bioethics-hall-of-fame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/who-would-you-put-in-the-bioethics-hall-of-fame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/who-would-you-put-in-the-bioethics-hall-of-fame/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<form mt:asset-id="385" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="emmy-statuette.jpg" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/emmy-statuette.jpg" width="232" height="560" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></form>
<p> A question I had never considered. That is, until I read <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/life/archive/2011/10/a-conversation-with-jonathan-d-moreno-bioethicist-and-professor/246013/">Nicolas Jackson&#8217;s interview</a> with Penn bioethics professor, Jonathan Moreno. </p>
<p>Moreno was asked &#8220;Who are three people or organizations that you would put in a Hall of Fame for your field?&#8221; His answers, some of which he admits are a bit self-serving, include 3 institutions, each of which is a non-controversial choice: <a href="http://thehastingscenter.org">The Hastings Center</a>, <a href="http://kennedyinstitute.georgetown.edu/">the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown</a>, and <a href="http://www.bioethics.upenn.edu/">UPenn</a>. </p>
<p>As for people in Moreno&#8217;s &#8220;Bioethics Hall of Fame&#8221;, he lists his colleagues&#8211;Art Caplan, Zeke Emanuel, and Amy Gutmann.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/who-would-you-put-in-the-bioethics-hall-of-fame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disaster Ethics: From Kansas City to New Orleans to Joplin</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/disaster-ethics-from-kansas-city-to-new-orleans-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/disaster-ethics-from-kansas-city-to-new-orleans-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/disaster-ethics-from-kansas-city-to-new-orleans-to/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<form mt:asset-id="384" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Logo2.0930111.jpg" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Logo2.0930111.jpg" width="275" height="238" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></form>
<p><a href="http://practicalbioethics.org">The Center for Practical Bioethics</a> is hosting a symposium and forum on the ethics of disasters on December 7 at the Kansas City Public Library-Plaza Branch. The symposium features presentations by medical professionals who were on the scene during the Hyatt Hotel disaster in Kansas City, Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, and the tornado that ripped through Joplin, Missouri in May 2011.</p>
<p>Continuing education credits are available for the symposium.</p>
<p>At 6 pm that evening, a public forum is scheduled with Anna Pou, MD, who spent nearly a week in Memorial Hospital in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/disaster-ethics-from-kansas-city-to-new-orleans-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Stem Cell [Awareness] Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/happy-stem-cell-awareness-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/happy-stem-cell-awareness-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stem Cell Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cell research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/happy-stem-cell-awareness-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a day for virtually everything these days. Forget the old school Valentine&#8217;s and Sweetest Day, or even Administrative Professional&#8217;s or Grandparents&#8217; Day. Today, October 5th is <a href="http://www.stemcellday.com/">Stem Cell Awareness Day</a>!</p>
<p>Who issued this proclamation? Well, a group that might be just a tiny bit interested in raising public awareness about stem cells, <a href="http://www.stemcellday.com/">CIRM</a> (the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine). </p>
<p>Their call to action: <small>&#8220;Every family knows they are one phone call or one diagnosis away from needing what stem cell research can yield for us.&#8221; <em> &#8211;Speaker Nancy Pelosi, U.S.</em></small>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/happy-stem-cell-awareness-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Danish Food Police Add Saturated Fat to Their List of Taxable &#8220;Sins&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/danish-food-police-add-saturated-fat-to-their-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/danish-food-police-add-saturated-fat-to-their-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics and Health Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/danish-food-police-add-saturated-fat-to-their-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-fat-tax-denmark-20111013,0,2603132.story">Denmark is taxing fatty foods</a> to the tune of $1.29/lb, reports the LA Times Booster Shots blog. Add this on to the sin taxes Danes already pay on sugary foods and their national ban on trans fats and I would argue that Denmark is the country with the most progressive food policy in the world. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s about time some country figured out that this is one of the key tools to beating the obesity epidemic. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been debating this issue with public health students since 2005 and I am so glad to finally see that someone, some country rather, has taken this point of view seriously.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/danish-food-police-add-saturated-fat-to-their-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Duty to Report Dead Ends?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/a-duty-to-report-dead-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/a-duty-to-report-dead-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/a-duty-to-report-dead-ends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When an investigational agent is being studied by pharma, is there an ethical responsibility to disclose the findings of that research, even if the agent is no longer being studied or being brought to market? </p>
<p>At least one researcher, <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110928142444.htm">as argued in last week&#8217;s Science Translational Medicine and reported in Science Daily</a>, believes that such a moral obligation does exist. Why the duty to disclose dead dead end data? </p>
<p>Because although most clinical trials end because the agent fails to be effective or safe, some studies conducted by industry are halted for reasons having nothing to do with the lack of efficacy or safety.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/a-duty-to-report-dead-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doth My Doctor Protest Too Much?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/doth-my-doctor-protest-too-much/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/doth-my-doctor-protest-too-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/doth-my-doctor-protest-too-much/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is there a limit to how far physicians can go in their social or political activism? Ford Vox, writing in <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/life/archive/2011/10/why-doctors-protest-too-much/245587/">The Atlantic</a>, suggests that perhaps there is. </p>
<p>Vox describes the problem like this:<br />
<small>&#8220;Doctors are in the cross-hairs of the nation&#8217;s politics more than ever. We&#8217;re all being asked to achieve more with less. We must cope with nightmare scenarios precipitated by cracks in the social and healthcare infrastructure so often these days that medical schools insist students become effective patient advocates as well as healers.</small>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/doth-my-doctor-protest-too-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug Shortages Hurt Man&#8230;.and His Best Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/08/drug-shortages-hurt-manand-his-best-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/08/drug-shortages-hurt-manand-his-best-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/08/drug-shortages-hurt-manand-his-best-friend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When a reproductive oncologist in <a href="http://bioethics.org">our clinical ethics certificate program</a> did a presentation on drug shortages in oncology last month, I thought perhaps this was just a highly specialized problem. When a few days ago I read <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/opinion/sunday/ezekiel-emanuel-cancer-patients.html">Zeke Emanuel&#8217;s piece in the NYT</a> about how we are &#8220;shortchanging cancer patients&#8221;, I began to think that this may just be an oncologist problem. </p>
<p>But when I read today on the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2011/08/10/fido-needs-his-meds-drug-shortages-affect-veterinary-care/">WSJ Health Blog</a> that nearly 200 drugs are unavailable or in short supply around the US, I began to wonder why there hasnt been significant public outcry about this.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/08/drug-shortages-hurt-manand-his-best-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Child Obesity A Form of Child Abuse?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/07/is-child-obesity-a-form-of-child-abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/07/is-child-obesity-a-form-of-child-abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/07/is-child-obesity-a-form-of-child-abuse/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As Art Caplan states in his most <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43727876/ns/health-health_care/">recent MSNBC column</a>, childhood obesity has reached epidemic proportions. Whether the result of the food industry, food marketing to children, or lifestyle choices, children (as well as their parents) are getting fat at an alarming rate. </p>
<p>But who is responsible for this tidal wave of obese children, really? It&#8217;s hard not to claim that parents, who are the providers of sustenance and the environment in which children learn about healthy (or unhealthy) eating, hold some of the responsibility for overweight and obese children.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/07/is-child-obesity-a-form-of-child-abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Problem of Celebrity Medical Activism</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/06/the-problem-of-celebrity-medical-activism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/06/the-problem-of-celebrity-medical-activism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/06/the-problem-of-celebrity-medical-activism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In one sense, I will grant that celebrities, just as much as any other person on the planet, have a right to speak out in regard to whatever research or clinical issue they feel passionate about. Arguably many of them have done a tremendous service to conditions like juvenile diabetes, Parkinson&#8217;s Disease, spinal cord injuries and ALS. </p>
<p>However, in most of these cases described above, the celebrity-cum-advocate has been effected by the condition themselves, have spent a significant amount of time dealing with the condition, and as a result are knowledgeable about the current state of scientific and medical research.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/06/the-problem-of-celebrity-medical-activism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patients Gifting to Providers: Ethical or Suspect?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/06/patients-gifting-to-providers-ethical-or-suspect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/06/patients-gifting-to-providers-ethical-or-suspect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[End-of-Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end of life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nurse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/06/patients-gifting-to-providers-ethical-or-suspect/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Art Caplan asks this very question in his MSNBC column this week. When a wealthy recluse died at the age of 104, to whom did she leave her fortune? Her nurse (to the tune of $30M) and her doctor (a measly $100K). Did these providers somehow cross a boundary between the provider-patient relationship? Or does this simply reflect the bond between caregivers and patients? </p>
<p>To read Art&#8217;s take on this issue, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43516963/ns/health-health_care/">click here</a>. </p>
<p>Summer Johnson McGee, PhD&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/06/patients-gifting-to-providers-ethical-or-suspect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.bioethics.net @ 2012-05-24 05:07:32 -->
